Below is a screenshot of that comment:
"His island attorney contacted me with the information...." I find this statement very unsettling. Why? What attorney on Guam would contact John Toves about his client? John Toves is not an attorney, a counselor, or a newspaper reporter. For what reason would an attorney contact John Toves and give him information about his client? Who is this attorney who gave out information about his client?
Since the attorney represents his client, why didn't he write a letter to the Archbishop, the media, or even the Archbishop's attorney informing him of his client's accusation? Why did this attorney go to John Toves, release details about his client, and allow Toves to release those details in the hopes of bringing another alleged victim forward?
John Toves further stated (the bold is mine):
I've called the Archbishop prior to every move but unfortunately always seem to get only voicemail. I mentioned that I had thoughts about the dance and other clips but I would like to hear good faith on his part. I'll be happy to provide call logs for this as well.What I placed in bold shows that John Toves has become so obsessed with ousting the Archbishop. He constantly harassed him through phone calls, poked fun at him through video clips, tweeted and Facebooked weekly that he no longer have a stable life but an abnormal obsession. Is it any wonder then why Archbishop Apuron obtained an attorney to inform John Toves to cease and desist? LikeTim Rohr, John Toves wanted Archbishop Apuron removed.
I've tweeted and Facebooked weekly to the island since January. I guess I need to get a life, - but I know I have my God.
So, Anon 6:08, I intend to remain a thorn in his side.