In the jungle, one can find John Toves' interview with Jesse Lujan and Ray Gibson. But for some reason, Tim Rohr missed John's interview with Patty Arroyo. That interview can be found in the following weblink below:
According to that Interview, John Toves admitted that his real motivation for coming out was to reinstate Monsignor James and Father Paul. It was not about his cousin who he claimed was sexually molested by the Archbishop. As a matter of fact, he admitted in this interview with Patty Arroyo that he never communicated with his cousin about his plan to launch the allegations against the Archbishop. He went on to say that he would continue the allegation regardless of whether he contacted his cousin or not. Therefore, John Toves was never speaking on behalf of his cousin. How does one represent someone they have never contacted and claim to speak on their behalf?
Where did John Toves get the idea that the island Catholics on Guam are suffering when he has not been on this island for 30 years? The only ones suffering are the very few people who oppose the Archbishop. So, how can he substantiate mass suffering of the island Catholics when he was living in California?