Thursday, May 5, 2016

My Take On Bob Klitzke

Once again, I thank the Genarinnis for coming out into the media trying to dispel the false information that has been spread by Tim Rohr.  Obviously, Tim Rohr and a few people have already made up their minds that the Genarinnis are liars even before they came out to speak.  If one really wants to resolve a controversial issue, one needs to listen to what the other say rather than believe they are liars even before they speak.  

Furthermore, a woman by the name of Carmen called up asking the SAME question.  Mr. Genarinni recognized the woman from the Travis Coffman show and she came on the Patty Arroyo talk show asking the SAME question.  Did she think he was going to give a different answer????     

After listening to the Patty Arroyo show, I find it extremely suspicious that LFM Bob Klitzkie felt so disappointed to hear Mr. Genarinni say that the RMS property belongs to the Archbishop.  So, we once again have it on record that Mr. Genarinni stated that the RMS property belongs to the Archdiocese of Agana and that the Archbishop is in full control of it.  However, Mr. Kliztkie's behavior was very puzzling for the following reasons: 

1.  He does not sound at all relieved to hear that the RMS property belongs to the Archbishop.  In fact, he felt the opposite. He was not happy to hear that the RMS property belongs to the Archdiocese of Agana despite the Declaration of Deed Restriction. I would think that hearing that would be a relief.  The people of Guam have heard Mr. Genarinni stated on record that the RMS property belongs to the Archbishop.  Is that not what LFM wanted to hear all along???    

2.  Bob Klitze was not listening when Mr. Genarinni said that he has the wrong document.  Bob insisted he has the right document.  Bob does not appear to be interested in finding out whether the documents are actually the same or not.  In fact, he did not even ask Mr. Genarinni if there was another amended Articles of Incorporation that the public may not be aware of.  According to Mr. Genarinni, the document he has in his possession specifies that RMS is a corporation sole, and Mr. Klitize does not seem one bit curious about that document????  According to the Old document, it was ARTICLE V  that stated that the Archbishop is the sole member.  However, Mr. Genarinni was pointing to ARTICLE VI in the document he has in possession.  The document that Mr. Genarinni has in his possession stated that ARTICLE VI says that the Archbishop is the sole member. and RMS is a corporation sole. According to what Mr. Genarinni read in HIS document over the talk show, it is NOT the same.  So, why was Bob Klitzie not curious about this new document???   

The interview at the Patty Arroyo talk show is found below:  

http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/pnc-k57-interviews/9189 

12 comments:

  1. Hi Diana. Thanks for the website. I listened to the interview and Genanrinni did say an amended Articles of Incorporation. That's why he was telling Klitzkie that he's looking at the wrong document, but Bob doesn't seem interested in hearing what document Genanrinni has. Now once JW realizes there's an amended document to the Articles of Incorporation,and that they've been holding the wrong one, they're gonna blame the archbishop. I can already see it. Rohr is gonna come out saying "It's your fault, archbishop. You didn't give us the right document." For someone who has been known of stealing documents, it's Rohr's fault that he couldn't get the right one......After all his bragging that he's the one with the truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rohr is a white collar criminal who steals and conspires to steal all documents he could have his hand on. It is scary. He abuses his access to clandestinely obtained information, as well, that is not for the public to know about. I am talking about strictly personal and private things that he exposes in a criminal manner. He even has the guts to brag about his behavior all the time.

      I have never seen anyone in the Catholic Church being morally more corrupt and depraved than Rohr and his jungle gang.

      Delete
    2. Dear Anonymous at 11:45 am,

      The fact that they used the wrong document also invalidates the Bronze opinion. Jackie Terlaje, on the other hand, used the correct document. You see what happens when the jungle teased and used derogatory names against Mrs. Terlaje? It comes back to bite them.

      Delete
  2. Taken from the Jungle.

    AnonymousMay 5, 2016 at 11:44 AM
    Hey, they say you folks have the wrong documents. Was there an amended document for the RMS? If so, was this document just revised because the 3 grantors are here? Something is pao take'.

    Reply
    Replies

    TimMay 5, 2016 at 12:35 PM
    Yes. They had something. I'll have it up later. An attempt to try to hide even more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous at 12:47 pm,

      This is exactly my point. Tim Rohr has not even looked at the new document and already he is making a judgment that the Archbishop and the NCW are trying to hide something.

      For the last three years, we have been saying that the RMS is a corporation sole and the RMS property belongs to the Archdiocese of Agana. And now, he is making up a story that we are attempting to hide something????? What exactly are we hiding when we have been saying all along that RMS is a corporation sole and the RMS property still belongs to the Archdiocese of Agana???

      Delete
    2. When was that new document made? We got the documents coming from Tax and Rev? Why does Tax and Rev not have that document?

      Delete
    3. Dear Anonymous at 2:39 pm,

      I doubt that it was recently made because the Archdiocese have always been saying that RMS is a corporation sole. I would be more concern as to why Tim Rohr have been spreading a lot of misinformation.

      Delete
  3. Just listned to the K57 interview with Patti. Misinformation and misunderstanding seems to be the reason for the anger of a group of Catholics towards the Archbishop and the NCW.

    One major argument is that the Mass has changed. In some parishes (like St Anthony and Santa Barbara), there are now commentaries made before Mass starts, and commentaries before each reading. Also, there are projectors and TV screens displaying prayers and song lyrics. These changes have not been questioned. However, the NCW Mass and adaptations granted by the Vatican have been widely criticized. St John Paul II and Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger (Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI) have celebrated the Mass with the NCW with the Mass adaptations.

    The Catholic Church is dynamic and adapts to the times and cultures of the world. If you look at the Catholic Church today and research the history of the Church since the time of Jesus Christ and Saint Peter, the Church has grown to what it is today with the help of the Holy Spirit. Jesus promised he would send the Paraclete to help us. How timely that Pentecost is near. At Pentecost, the disciples were filled with the Holy Spirit. The disciples spoke in different tongues and were emboldened, filled with the Holy Spirit, to proclaim the Gospel. And to also baptize in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. To bring people to know Jesus Christ.

    Fruits of the Holy Spirit are many. And one fruit is the Neocatechumenal Way. Is this the only way, the only fruit? Of course not! People are called to charisms that they believe is good for them.

    May the peace of the risen Christ be with you!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Agree that the Mass has undergone adaptations. There are Masses celebrated in the Filipino, Korean, Chukese languages. And also in Chamorro. So these changes are ok but not the adaptations for the Mass how it is celebrated by the Way? The reasoning is "it is ok for the way I like it but not in these other languages." So when people with this thinking go on off-island pilgrimmages, they are going to complain that the Mass is in Spanish, Italian, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese and other languages of the world. And when on these pilgrimmages they may feel uncomfortable because they are not in their comfort zone. Let's be real. When Blessed Diego Luis de San Vitores and other Spanish missionaries brought Christianity to Guam, I don't think they were in their comfort zone. They learned the local language. In fact, seminarians from countries throughout the world studying at the seminary learn English and prayers in Chamorro. Are they in their comfort zone? Who were among the first to translate prayer and songs to Chamorro? The early Spanish missionaries. We should be grateful to God for sending us these Spanish missionaries, and other Catholic religious orders to bring Jesus Christ to the Chamorros. So is this the way we thank God by viciously shouting "GO HOME!" to those who voluntarity come here to help spread the faith?

      Delete
  4. Amen to that!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wow...this ia all like "Days of our Lives" Catholic soap opera.....
    Can't wait to hear and see what happens tomorrow...
    All topics of the contraversy....
    Personally.... I'm for the Way.....
    Just thinking out loud.....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Klitzkie was just disruptive and no interest to hear Ginnirini. When Klitzkie was ask to read Article 6 he blabber away. Shows the unprofessional approach and to me he has no class. Carmen in the other hand kept reading old article about Pope Benedict halting the Way for further investigation is plainly a way to attack. News Flash Carmen... it has been corrected since 2008. Pope Francis cancelled the investigation. Get it to your mind instead of speaking out of your hip!

    ReplyDelete