Also, according to the article:
"It wasn't that we were necessarily against [the Neocatechumens]," Jenkins said. "It was just that we didn't understand. No one explained the changes."
Granyak declined to comment. McIntyre, however, acknowledged "tension in some long-standing parishes." and attributed much of the concerns to congregants' wariness of something new.It is normal for people to be afraid of change because most people are comfortable with the status quo. Nevertheless, the NCW have the approval and support of four popes, which includes Pope Francis. It is the responsibility of the Bishop to support what Rome approves. He does not have to promote it, but he should support it, not suppress it as some priests would. Yes, it is unfortunate that some priests have called for a moratorium on the Way. In fact, we already know of one local priest who did just that. It is the duty and responsibility of the Bishop to help his priests understand the things that Rome has approved so there would be less tension.
The article goes on to say (the bold is mine):
In October, Archbishop Michael Jude Byrnes of Guam closed the island’s Neocatechumenal Way seminary after finding four priests guilty of insubordination.This is incorrect. The news report was implying that the reason for the closure of the seminary was due to the insubordination of four priests. Archbishop Byrnes had already decided to close the seminary BEFORE those four priests were found guilty of insubordination.
We have the full support of Pope Francis. In his letter to the Neocatechumenal Way, Pope Francis stated: And today I confirm your call, I support your mission and I bless your charism. Rome is fully aware of the fruits from the Neocatechumenal Way. Christ said, "You will know them by their fruits." There are many fruits of the NCW. They include the vocational inspirations into the priesthood and religious life, the active participation in the parish life, missionary zeal of the families and itinerants, and conversion of heart.
Two nights a week, Jose and Maribel Martin leave their eight children to a sitter’s care and walk the streets of St. Charles Borromeo parish on a mission to energize the Roman Catholic church.
In a South Philly neighborhood an ocean away from their Madrid birthplace, the couple traverse blocks of brick rowhouses and knock on doors, eager to spread the Gospel to whoever answers.
“It’s a call from the Lord,” said Martin, 38, who has been making these rounds for more than three years. “We don’t proselytize in the sense of saying, ‘Come join our church.’ We say, ‘We come from St. Charles, and we want to bring you this good news — how God changed my life.’”
At the invitation of Archbishop Charles J. Chaput in 2014, the Martins and another missionary family settled in the Archdiocese of Philadelphia to advance theNeocatechumenal Way, a program of immersive spiritual development practiced in small groups. Its followers make a lifetime commitment to not only study the Catholic faith, but also to share it. They do so with an evangelical zeal that is uncommon in traditional parishes — and occasionally unsettling for their congregations, including St. Charles’.
“The Way” began in Spain in 1964, but got the Vatican’s imprimatur only in 2008 under Pope Benedict XVI. It now claims more than one million adherents in 6,000 parishes worldwide, making it one of the “most important in a galaxy of new movements and associations” within Roman Catholicism, said Massimo Faggioli, a Villanova University theology professor and author of two books on the subject.
In the Philadelphia Archdiocese, the movement is a presence in a dozen parishes, with a total of about 300 followers. The first group was formed 25 years ago at St. Dominic in Torresdale. The two congregations with missionary families — St. Charles and St. Michael, in Northern Liberties — also are led by priests schooled in the Way. The movement operates more than 100 seminaries, one of which opened four years ago on the grounds of the former St. Louis parish in Yeadon.
In the St. Charles and St. Michael parishes, both of which had suffered flagging attendance, the missionary families “get to know neighbors, interact in different ways, on the street, in the supermarket, at a kid’s soccer game,” said Bishop John J. McIntyre, head of the archdiocese’s Secretariat for Evangelization. “They might go to a public park and sing.”
In these fraught times for mainstream religion, he added, “there is a real need” for extraordinary effort, “especially in the West where practice of the faith is diminishing.”
But if the Way’s mission is to expand the ranks of practicing Catholics and excite those whose faith has gone cold, it also has been, on occasion, controversial and divisive. In some parishes, congregants have complained that the small groups, meeting apart from the larger church community, are secretive; that they engage in atypical liturgical practices; that they do it all with fleeting regard for tradition. At St. Charles, some of those worries, and others, were laid out in a series of letters to McIntyre.
The Rev. Esteban Granyak, the Way-trained parish administrator, “started right away to change things in a way that was insensitive to what was already there and not considering the concerns of parishioners,” said Carolyn Jenkins, a lifelong St. Charles member who sits on the parish council and serves as a lector and eucharistic minister.
The evangelizing not only shook the status quo, but longtime staff members were let go, railings were removed from around an altar where parishioners knelt to pray, and sections of the church campus were set aside for use by Neocatechumens, Jenkins said. Some members, she added, left in frustration.
“It wasn’t that we were necessarily against [the Neocatechumens],” Jenkins said. “It was just that we didn’t understand. No one explained the changes.”
Granyak declined to comment. McIntyre, however, acknowledged “tension in some long-standing parishes,” and attributed much of the concern to congregants’ wariness of something new.
“We hope the priests can help parishioners understand,” McIntyre said. In St. Charles’ case, he added, Granyak has met with members to address “any missteps he may have made.”
Incorporating the Way into parish life requires a pastor’s strong guidance, said the Rev. Hugh Dougherty, formerly of St. Thomas More in Chester County’s South Coventry Township, which hosted its first Neocatechumenal group 15 years ago. Likening the Way’s followers to Eagles fans, he said, “People are enthusiastic [in their commitment], and sometimes enthusiastic people can be very irritating.”
Still, any local dissension pales next to disputes that have erupted in other parts of the globe.
In 2011, the president of the Catholic Bishops Conference of Japan said in a statement that problems with the Neocatechumenal Way had resulted in “confusion, conflict, division and chaos.” Bishops there had attempted to suspend the Way’s activity, saying it failed to respect Japanese Catholic culture, but Pope Benedict insisted the two sides resolve their differences. The movement has also stirred controversy in the Philippines, and drawn criticism from bishops in the United Kingdom and Italy.
In October, Archbishop Michael Jude Byrnes of Guam closed the island’s Neocatechumenal Way seminary after finding four priests guilty of insubordination.
In other countries, when Neocatechumens arrive, “they tend to take over and create a tension within the local clergy and with local Catholics because it’s a movement based on a high level of commitment of the members,” said Faggioli, the Villanova professor.
Founded in the slums of Madrid 54 years ago, the Way is a product of a religious conversion experienced by Spanish painter and musician Francisco “Kiko” Arguello after visiting the home of a family cook. Distressed by the troubled life of the mother of nine, he moved in to protect her from her abusive, alcoholic husband.
In the suffering of the family, indeed the entire neighborhood, Arguello said he saw the life of the Christian savior.
“I saw Christ crucified. I saw Christ in Bertha…,” he wrote on the Way’s website. He later met chemist and theologian Carmen Hernandez (who died in 2016), and the two started a ministry. Seeking to reach the poor, they formed a small Christian community that became the Neocatechumenal Way.
Followers complete an initial eight-week course of study aimed at deepening their faith, then join up with groups of about 30 with whom they study, worship and commit to evangelizing inside and outside the parish. They attend study sessions on Wednesdays and Mass in small groups on Saturdays.
Ed Fowler, a real estate appraiser from Elverson who became part of the Way 15 years ago, found the experience transformative.
“When you come to church, sometimes you feel like you’re walking into a crowd, not a community” said Fowler, 74, who helps lead the Way community at St. Thomas More. The small-group format helped him to develop a relationship with God “in a personal way,” he said.
Indeed, parishioners who are part of an increasingly diverse Catholic church often seek “ways to feel at home” in the congregations, said Tricia Bruce, an associate professor of sociology at Maryville College in Tennessee and author of Parish and Place: Making Room for Diversity in the American Catholic Church. Also, new movements can create parish spaces where members can try something new that will make them excited to go to Mass, she said.
McIntyre said the archdiocese hasn’t yet been able to definitively assess the Way’s impact. “It’s a long process of building community” that “has born some fruit in terms of reaching different people,” the bishop said.
The Way reached Jose Martin after his mother’s early death devastated him as a teenager. Now, he says, he is returning the favor. Before coming to Philadelphia, he and his family had one other missionary posting, in Denver. “It’s been difficult to leave everything behind, our house, job, friends,” said Martin, who works as director of religious education at St. Katharine Drexel parish in Chester. “But the Lord has given us everything 100-fold.”
Asked about the impact he has made, he wouldn’t venture to guess, but said, “When you go to a home and someone there is fighting and you give them a word and they are helped, maybe they don’t come to Mass — but they have been helped.”
Funny they walk door-to-door and the jungle walks in front of the door of the church with picket signs ? ÷ +
ReplyDeleteBiba St. Francis de Sales!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your prayers of peace, patience, and unity for our church and communities! Thank you for leaving behind your wisdom inspired by the Holy Spirit on how we can find holiness in our everyday lives and not just through religious and priestly vocations! Please continue to pray for us, our church, and the communities in which we live.
I was reviewing this article and its interesting that they don't explain or attempt to explain why it stirs controversy. In my experience the way is not controversial, because it teaches and is faithful to the traditions of the church and its documents. It is only controversial to those who disagree with the Roman Catholic Church and its teachings but would like the Catholic Church to be something else maybe even more liberal.
ReplyDeleteThese types of people mainly fit into one or both of these categories.
Those who disagree with the Second Vatican Council and those who disagree with the document Humanae Vitae.
In other words those who would like the Catholic Church to be pro birth control and ultimately more sexual freedom and those who would like to go back to the Latin mass and all that implies.
What they don't tell you in the article is that the weekly collection increased by a few thousand dollars as soon as some of those workers where let go (no one knows what was happening to that collection before). Or that the parish was going to close before the way was sent to strengthen the faith of the neighborhood. As well as empty the swamp it seems.
ReplyDeleteThe paid workers where let go due to financial problems while members of the way offered to do it for free.
The changes and the NCW was explained to the parishioners of the parish many times but they refused to agree even with church doctrine in favor of a more liberal view of Catholicism. A liberal view which helps foster corruption and teachings that do not allow parishioners to deepen their faith and come closer to understanding God and Christ not the truth they wish to impose.
Simultaneously new parishioners seem to start getting closer to those parishes with renewed faith. (Parishes which haven't have new parishioners in ages). People who genuinely wish to live Christian lives. Whose marriage is being rebuilt, and who even come from other religious faiths and have converted to Catholicism.
Diana... Tim is at it again... disseminating his speculations.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.guampdn.com/story/opinion/2018/01/28/letter-apuron-asked-help-pope-knew-what-coming/1072816001/
They got their job stealing jobs back and they got the churches properties why are they still bashing the bishop ???
ReplyDeleteDiana, why won't you tell us where the RMS seminaries went? Do you know?
ReplyDeleteSimon Peter
Dear Simon Peter,
DeleteYes, I know where they went. The NCW constantly keeps in contact with their seminarians because they also walk in their communities. The question is why do YOU want to know.
My reasons for wanting to know are good ones. Why are YOU being so defensive? Note, Diana you are calling them “their seminarians”....maybe this WAS the problem all along. Simon Peter
ReplyDeleteDear Simon Peter,
DeleteWhy are YOU being defensive on the word "their". Look at the context on how the word is used. I called them "their" seminarians in the sense that they are walking in "their" community. I also have a community. It is not "your"community because you do not walk in it. We are all members of the Catholic Church, but there are only some Catholics who chose to join the many different organizations inside the Church.
If you wish to know where they are, ask Archbishop Byrnes. You do not need to ask the NCW because we are not the Bishop.
Dear Anon @ 2:12pm
DeleteThe real problem is that you do not respect the call of these seminarians. You believe that the way has some sort of hold over them and you wish to have that hold over them. We are merely respecting their own wishes and spirituality. They felt called through the way and don't wish to change that. You want to demonize that call and turn it against the NCW. You hypocritically accuse the NCW of forcing their spirituality and you wish to force your spirituality on those in the NCW.
Go ask the ones who shut the doors???
ReplyDeleteYeah I don't get it you had one priest who protected a murderer and a rapist and the another priest who Miss managed churches money and now there are the ones who are running things and now you see an empty Seminary who hosts all the good priest Tim Rohr is proud of that empty sign what a shame
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 6:28 pm and 7:59 pm,
DeleteCould you please create a username? Those are diocesan seminarians. The bishop should know where he sent his diocesan seminarians.