This is my response:
Dear Sunday Picketer,
First of all, David Lujan officially became Roland Sondia's lawyer when he publicly announced his accusation against Archbishop Apuron at a press conference with David Lujan standing right beside him. See the photo below:
Last Friday - on Friday the 13th - the Archdiocese of Agana announced plans to file a civil suit against those spreading lies about the church and Archbishop Anthony Apuron.
There was already an anticipation of a lawsuit before any of the alleged victims came out. In fact, Tim Rohr admitted through news media that he obtained a lawyer for the alleged victims due to this anticipation of a lawsuit that was announced by the Archdiocese on May 13th. Furthermore, KUAM news reported that David Lujan was officially Mr. Sondia's lawyer.
However, even with the anticipation of a lawsuit that was made by Archbishop Apuron, Mr. Sondia was allowed to testify to the media without the presence of his lawyer. He was also allowed to testify in the public hearing for a bill that would lift the statutes of limitation, and again without the presence of his lawyer.
The only difference between the Patti Arroyo talk show and the Vatican investigators is that Patti Arroyo never swore Mr. Sondia in. The Vatican investigators, on the other hand, would ask Mr. Sondia to swear to tell the truth before the Almighty God.
Secondly, Roland Sondia is not the one on trial. Archbishop Apuron is the one on trial. The investigators were there to get depositions in order to determine what the truth is so that a just judgement of guilty or not guilty would be rendered onto Archbishop Apuron. So, what does Roland Sondia and his lawyer have to fear when they were not the ones on trial? The Pope will judge Archbishop Apuron's fate after the documents are reviewed in the canonical trial; therefore, that was an opportunity for Mr. Sondia to finally tell his side of the story to the Vatican, and he refused. His refusal makes the case for Archbishop Apuron stronger and in his favor.
Finally, you stated: "if anyone is being used and deceived it's the members of the NCW...." Sunday Picketer, YOU were the one who was deceived into believing that there was no canonical trial. The jungle led you to believe that the canonical trial did not exist. Now, you know it exists. YOU were deceived into believing that Archbishop Apuron was hiding out in the seminary that some of the Sunday picketers showed up at the doorsteps of the seminary demanding to speak to Apuron. Now, you know that Archbishop Apuron was never on Guam.