Wednesday, September 17, 2014

The Neocatechumenal Way By Father Ian Ker

The Neocatechumenal Way is not a movement, but some people refer to it as such.  It is actually an itinerary to Christian formation.  With many movements inside the Catholic Church, it is not surprising to find some people mistaking the Way as a movement.  Below is an article written by Father Ian Ker about the Neocatechumenal Way in 2008. The article is found on Catholic Online: 


"This recently approved and rapidly growing ecclesial movement will play a decisive role in the future of the Catholic Church" says Fr. Ian Ker.

Throughout the western world the Church is declining.

The most prominent exception to the general rule of decline is the rise and growth of the movements and communities described as "ecclesial" rather than "lay" by Pope John Paul II because they are open to all the baptised, whether lay, clerical, or religious, thus manifesting in concrete form the ecclesiology of organic communion that the Church recovered in Vatican II's Constitution of the Church.

Of the various new ecclesial movements the largest, fastest-growing, and most controversial is the Neocatechumenal Way, whose statutes were officially approved by the Holy See last week.

Ten years ago, in an important theological address on the ecclesial movements, Pope Benedict XVI stressed that in the matter of discerning new charisms in the Church bishops should respect the primacy of the Petrine office. He will now be expecting bishops hostile to the Neocatechumenate to respect that primacy.

In that same address in 1998 the present Pope spoke enthusiastically of how at the beginning of the 1970s he had "come into close contact with movements like the Neocatechumens, Communione e Liberazione, and the Focolarini and thus experienced the enthusiasm and verve with which they lived out their faith".

This was the time, he recalled, when "after the great upsurge of the Council, a frost seemed to set in instead of springtime". A year later Cardinal Ratzinger told a meeting of bishops that the first of the new ecclesial movements he had encountered was the Neocatechumenal Way and he had been "delighted" to discover this "new post-baptismal catechumenate" at a time when "the family and the school were no longer, as they had been in the past, places of initiation into the faith and into communion with Christ in the Church".

The Neocatechumenal Way began in 1963 when a young, talented Spanish painter called Kiko Arg�ello, who had had a conversion experience after a period of atheism as a student, returned for Christmas to his parents' house.

There he found the cook in tears in the kitchen. Spain was still a very poor country in the early 1960s, and Kiko learned that the woman lived with her drunken and abusive husband in one of the shanty towns on the outskirts of Madrid. Kiko visited the woman in the squalid shack where she lived.

Hearing what seemed like a call from God to leave everything, he went to stay with the family in their tiny kitchen. The scene of utter desolation in that slum so horrified him that, on completing his national service, he decided that in the event of the Second Coming he would want Christ to find him at the feet of the crucified Christ - namely, at the feet of the poorest of the poor.

His inspiration came from Charles de Foucauld: to live in silence at the feet of Christ crucified. He went to live himself in a shack in the shanty town, taking nothing with him except his Bible and guitar. The slum-dwellers were curious as to who he was and why he was there.

They discovered he was a Christian and began to ask him questions about the Gospel. The group that gathered round him in 1963 were the first community of what was to become the Neocatechumenal Way, and Kiko's talks to this group the first so-called "catechesis". At the same time he was joined by a young Spanish woman called Carmen Hern�ndez, who had just completed a theology degree at a missionary institute.

When the police began to pull down the shanty town Kiko appealed to the then Archbishop of Madrid, Mgr Casimiro Morcillo. Morcillo came to see for himself and was so impressed by the work Kiko and Carmen were doing that he invited them to begin the same catechesis in the parishes of Madrid. Subsequently, he gave them a letter of introduction to the Cardinal Vicar of Rome, who invited them to do the same in Rome.

The movement spread with extraordinary rapidity and as early as 1974 Pope Paul VI publicly hailed its members. He said: "Here we see post-conciliar fruits! ... How great is the joy, how great is the hope, which you give us with your presence and with your activity!"

Pope John Paul II enthusiastically supported the Way, resisting hostile pressure from within the Roman Curia as well as the local episcopate. And in 1987 he asked the movement to open a seminary in the diocese of Rome; today about half the ordinations for the diocese of Rome come from this Redemptoris Mater seminary, the first of the 70 that now exist worldwide, including one in the Westminster diocese.

So far 1,600 priests have been ordained from these seminaries, which have now about 2,000 seminarians. The movement itself has about a million members, excluding children, belonging to some 20,000 communities.

Why is there such opposition to the Neocatechumenate?

First of all, because there is opposition to all the movements from local bishops and clergy. This is nothing new: St Thomas Aquinas had to defend the Dominicans against the local clergy in Paris; after the Council of Trent bishops whose hearts were not in real reform and renewal did not want the Jesuits in their dioceses.

G K Chesterton noted that whenever there has "appeared, in Catholic history, a new and promising experiment, bolder or broader, more enlightened than existing routine, that movement" was always "upheld" by the papacy, while it was "naturally more or less negatively resisted by the bishops... [and] the clergy... Official oligarchies of that sort generally do resist reform."

Secondly, the Neocatechumenate is especially controversial because it operates within rather than externally to parishes. The main bone of contention is the Saturday evening Mass celebrated for a community or communities.

However, we already have children's and family Masses in parishes from which adults and single people are not excluded, nor have parishioners ever been excluded from Neocatechumenal Eucharists, contrary to popular rumour.

The statutes specifically state that these Eucharists are "part of the ordinary liturgical pastoral work of the parish and are open also to other faithful"; the same would be true of a Tridentine Mass.

They recognise that the Neocats are entitled to have a Mass in their own style, with a number of liturgical innovations (others that were originally permitted on an experimental basis have been disallowed), but it is open to all parishioners, and is no more divisive than a folk or Latin or Tridentine Mass is in a parish.

Anyway, Pope Benedict has firmly rejected the charge of divisiveness as the decisive criterion: "Faith remains a sword and may demand conflict for the sake of truth and love," he has said. And he also has condemned that "attitude of intellectual superiority that immediately brands the zeal of those seized by the Holy Spirit and their uninhibited faith with the anathema of fundamentalism", a charge regularly levelled at members of the Neocatechumenate.

At the time of the Council of Trent what the Church needed above all was a body of highly trained clergy: the charism of St Ignatius Loyola was provided by the Holy Spirit. In this post-conciliar time the greatest need is for baptised Catholics who are not merely sacramentalised but deeply formed in the faith: the Holy Spirit has given the Church the Neocatechumenate.

I believe that June 13, 2008, the day its statutes were formally approved, will be recognised as a significant date in the history of the Church.

Fr Ian Ker teaches theology at Oxford and is a parish priest

This editorial is printed with the permission of the Catholic Herald (UK) and is a part of Catholic online's commitment to feature the new ecclesial movements as a "sign of Spring" in the Church. 


http://www.catholic.org/news/international/europe/story.php?id=28614

36 comments:

  1. Fr Ker is evidently under the mistaken impression that the NCW follows its own statutes. He also, as you point out, refers to the NCW as a movement, which you would strongly object to if it was a negative article.

    Fr Ker obviously doesn't have any idea of the truth about the NCW.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous at 4:47 pm,

      He wrote this article six years ago. At that time, there were many people using the word "movement" when the Statutes were recently passed. Now, with time and correction, people are beginning to understand that it is not a movement.

      Fr. Ker is correct, and he is aware of the controversy. As he pointed out in his article:

      "First of all, because there is opposition to all the movements from local bishops and clergy. This is nothing new: St Thomas Aquinas had to defend the Dominicans against the local clergy in Paris; after the Council of Trent bishops whose hearts were not in real reform and renewal did not want the Jesuits in their dioceses.

      G K Chesterton noted that whenever there has "appeared, in Catholic history, a new and promising experiment, bolder or broader, more enlightened than existing routine, that movement" was always "upheld" by the papacy, while it was "naturally more or less negatively resisted by the bishops... [and] the clergy... Official oligarchies of that sort generally do resist reform." "

      Delete
    2. @AnonymousSeptember 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM
      First of all, Diana introduced the article by objecting to calling it a "movement", by saying that the NCW in fact is not a movement. Secondly, it is very presumptuous of you to say that Ker has no idea about the NCW. I think you are the one who has the wrong ideas.
      I think this is a very good article.

      Delete
  2. An excellent article. Taken from Wikipedia : Ian Ker is an English Roman Catholic priest, scholar and author. He is generally regarded as the world's authority on John Henry Newman, on whom he has published more than twenty books.

    Father Ian Ker teaches theology at Oxford University, where he is a Senior Research Fellow at Blackfriars, Oxford,and a member of the Faculty of Theology . He has taught both English literature and theology at universities in the UK and USA. Father Ker is generally regarded as the leading authority on Blessed John Henry Newman,....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous September 17, 2014 at 4:47 PM

    You question one...you question all. Do you also have issues with the unique ways of worship for the following churches? We are after all recognized as on Catholic church.

    Another disparity that you should research a little is how many proclaimed Catholics actually believe in the presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist or how many Catholics actually baptize their child and grand children. Then you will really have something to complain about.

    Autonomous particular churches

    Main articles: Latin Church and Eastern Catholic Churches

    The Catholic Church is made up of 23 autonomous particular churches, each of which accepts the supreme authority of the Bishop of Rome on matters of doctrine.[14][43] These churches, also known by the Latin term sui iuris churches, are communities of Catholic Christians whose forms of worship reflect different historical and cultural influences rather than differences in doctrine. In general, each sui iuris church is headed by a patriarch or high-ranking bishop,[44] and has a degree of self-governance over the particulars of its internal organization, liturgical rites, liturgical calendar and other aspects of its spirituality.

    The largest by far of the particular churches is the Latin Church, which reports over one billion members. It developed in southern Europe and North Africa. Then it spread throughout Western, Central and Northern Europe, before expanding to the rest of the world. The Latin Church considered itself to be the oldest and largest branch of Western Christianity,[45] a heritage of certain beliefs and customs originating in various European countries, some of which are shared also by many Christian denominations that trace their origins to the Protestant Reformation.[45]

    Relatively small in terms of adherents compared to the Latin Church, but important to the overall structure of the Church, are the 22 self-governing Eastern Catholic Churches with a combined membership of 17.3 million as of 2010.[46] The Eastern Catholic Churches follow the traditions and spirituality of Eastern Christianity and are composed of Eastern Christians who have always remained in full communion with the Catholic Church or who have chosen to reenter full communion in the centuries following the East–West Schism and earlier divisions. Some Eastern Catholic Churches are governed by a patriarch who is elected by the synod of the bishops of that church,[47] others are headed by a major archbishop,[48] others are under a metropolitan,[49] and others are organized as individual eparchies.[50] The Roman Curia has a specific department, the Congregation for the Oriental Churches, to maintain relations with them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon at 12:50pm, I'm not sure what you are asking. Do you mean to imply that the Neocatechumenal Way is an "autonomous particular Church". If so, I would simply direct you to the Statutes. The NCW is an itinerary of formation - a bit like the RCIA. Does the RCIA have its own liturgy (Or to put it another way - are those involved in the RCIA permitted to vary the rubrics of the Mass?)

      Now the NCW Statutes state clearly that the NCW is to follow the rubrics of the Roman (Latin) Rite, with some minor variations (concessions) that have been approved by the Holy See. Those variations are also very clear, but do not include: The preferential use of a table rather than a dedicated altar; the preferential use of a location other than a dedicated Church; the placing of flowers on the altar; the placing of the Hebrew Menorah on the altar; the overuse of "echoes"; singing/music during certain parts of the Mass; the distribution of communion prior to the priest's communion; sitting down to consume communion; dancing around the table/altar. And so on.

      I remind you again that the NCW is meant to be celebrating the Mass as per the Roman Rite.

      As for the problems with belief in the Real Presence and the general falling away of the faithful - well, I agree with you totally.

      However, we will not produce a return to the True Faith, by substituting it with a fabricated, deficient faith.

      Delete
    2. Well said 3:56 PM! I'd like to hear the "Insider's View" on this.

      Delete
    3. Dear Anonymous at 4:13 am,

      What exactly do you want to hear or do you have a question about the article I posted?

      Delete
    4. Dear Diana -- If you didn't understand....4:13 AM wants to hear what you have to say about the comments 3:56 PM made. However, you probably can't say anything, simply because all the things that 3:56 mentioned are true.

      Delete
    5. Dear Anonymous at 10:08 am,

      I think the discussion between the two anonymous posters was good because the discussion is civil. I agree with Anonymous 4:47 p.m. And Anonymous 3:56 pm agreed with Anonymous 4:47 pm. when he/she stated the following:

      "Another disparity that you should research a little is how many proclaimed Catholics actually believe in the presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist or how many Catholics actually baptize their child and grand children. Then you will really have something to complain about."

      As Anonymous 4:47 p.m. pointed out, there are many liturgies in the Catholic Church in both the Latin rite and Eastern rite Church. Even the Opus Dei have their own liturgy, but I do not see the jungle complaining about it. The NCW believes that the bread and wine becomes the Body and Blood of our Lord Jesus Christ as should all Catholics in the Church.

      However, not every Catholic believes that. There are Catholics in the regular mass that do not believe the bread and wine turns into the Body and Blood of Christ. Not every Catholic baptize their children or grandchildren. Not every Catholic takes the Mass seriously. Just go into the jungle and you will hear Tim Rohr encouraging parishioners to record the homily of the priests or Archbishop and send the recordings to him. A person is supposed to go to Mass because of their love for God....not to spy on a priest or the Archbishop. So, those who attend Mass simply to become a spy is not there for Christ. They have an agenda that has nothing to do with God.

      Delete
    6. Oh so I see you DO read Jungle Watch. You have to remember that Jungle Watch is about those looking out for Mother Church and if it means recording a priest or the Archbishop to show a wrongdoing, you can just call it part of our job.

      Delete
    7. Dear Anonymous at 9:48 p.m.,

      All the time that our Catholic brothers were leaving the Catholic Church to join the Christian churches, what was Junglewatch doing about it? The percentage of Catholics on Guam have decreased to 85%. What did junglewatch do for the youths to try and keep them in the Church? How was it looking out for Mother Church as the number of Catholics dwindled down, and not many attend Sunday Masses? Did Junglewatch go out to evangelize to try and bring back the Catholic brothers?

      Delete
    8. And who is to blame? ALL this has been happening under the leadership of Archbishop Apuron!!

      Delete
    9. Dear Anonymous at 7:42 am,

      All this has been happening all over the world, not just in Guam. So, do not try to blame the Archbishop for something going on all over the world. Secularization is a reality, which is pulling people away from Catholic teachings. The Protestants have been very active in recruiting our brothers and sisters in the Catholic Church.

      The Archbishop did something about it by bringing the NCW into Guam......because the only way to bring back our Catholic brothers (and even convert Protestants) is through evangelization......something which Junglewatch does not do and never did.

      Delete
    10. Excuse me Diana, but if you've forgotten, the focus of this discussion here is Guam. You're trying to circumvent the issue by saying the Archbishop is not to blame for the things happening all over the world. Of course we know that. What we're saying is that he is to blame for the issues happening here on Guam....as exactly pointed out by Msgr Quitugua (the elder) in front of the Nuncio!

      Delete
    11. And do you know why the Protestants have been very active in recruiting people from the Catholic Church? Because they know that a lot of Catholics are disappointed with Archbishop Apuron and this makes it very easy for them to recruit.

      Delete
    12. Dear Anonymous at 9:13 pm,

      For a long time, no financial report has ever been published, not even while Monsignor James was in charge. For a long time, Archbishop Balvo has been asking for the financial report, and none has been produced; therefore, it would be time for a change if Monsignor James is unable to produce an annual financial report during the many years that he was in charge.

      Now, that he has been removed, the Internal Review has come in so they can get a financial report published. From what I heard, the situation is a lot worse than we expected. Hopefully, the Internal Review would be done soon so that a financial report can be published with all the problems including any "under the table" dealings that has been occurring.

      Delete
    13. Dear Anonymous at 9:17 p.m.,

      Are you also going to blame the earthquake on the Archbishop? As I said, the number of Catholics leaving the Church is happening all over the world. The same trend was happening in Guam as you get more influx of Protestants coming in. The Protestants are very active in evangelization. I get more Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons knocking on my door before the Way came in. Where were the Catholics??

      Delete
    14. OMG Diana. The blame on the Archbishop was directed at your comment on Sep 20 @ 10:03 PM. Your question regarding the earthquake is way out on left field.

      Delete
    15. "The Protestants are very active in evangelization. I get more Jehovah Witnesses and Mormons knocking on my door before the Way came in."

      I have yet to see any Neos come knocking at my door to evangelize. Where are they?

      Delete
    16. Dear Anonymous at 8:27 am.,

      So far, I have gone evangelizing in Agana Heights and Yona. I do not know where the other communities have evangelized. Perhaps, we have not yet reached your village.

      Delete
    17. Dear Anonymous at 8:23 am,

      Is my statement really that far off? We all know that Catholicism has decreased in western Europe. It also decreased in Brazil, which was the last world youth day. It has decreased here in Guam as well. You are blaming the Archbishop for something that has been going on in the western world. So, my statement is not that far off. If there was a decline in tourism, people would blame the Archbishop for that too.

      Delete
    18. Diana @ 6:16 AM: The ultimate responsibility of the financial report falls on the PASTOR of the Agana Cathedral Basilica who is Archbishop Anthony Apuron. That is why the letter from Archbishop Balvo is addressed to him and not Msgr James.

      Delete
    19. Dear Anonymous at 12:44 pm,

      I agree, but to get that financial report, he needed the COOPERATION of Monsignor James and his staff. If he cannot get that cooperation, he might as well fire them and put in new people who can cooperate with him. The Archbishop cannot do everything alone.

      Delete
  4. AnonymousSeptember 18, 2014 at 3:56 PM

    Why don't we just agree that one of us, one day will be answerable for our comments and our actions. Only then can accept who substitutes; who fabricates.

    I opened my bible by chance and read; 1 THESSALONIANS Chapter 2; verse 12 - 16. If I die tonight anonymous, I am not afraid to receive what is due to me.........are you?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anon at 6:45, that's being rather personal, isn't it? Why judgement and arrogance? If there is something wrong with what I have said point it out, otherwise, why do you strike me?

      Delete
  5. Anonymous September 19, 2014 at 9:18 PM

    Romans Chapter 8 verses 14-17

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous at 1:40 pm,

      Quoting biblical scripture does not answer the question. The person asked you to point out where he/she is in error. You should be able to do this in your own words.

      Delete
  6. Diana, September 20 1:40 a.m.

    there is no human answer that can answer or completely satisfy anonymous.

    If the Spirit does not work in the heart...it does not move...... PERIOD.

    If he answers truthfully what I previous asked......are you ready...are you prepared?..then maybe we can be guided to an answer that he will accept....contemplate....receive.

    But he choses to ask 3 subsequent questions that is in my opinion running away from the first question.

    Are you ready? Simple yes or no......YES or NO

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Rohr backers have no clue about the liturgy, the liturgical laws and the spirit of Vatican II. Indeed, they have very little discernment into life in general. While Guam has one of the highest abortion, suicide and divorce rates in the world, they are fixated about the menorah and the flowers on the altar/table. Give me a break! As we speak, there are souls being lost to the devil, while they are harping over the perceived judgement they have over the lack of awareness of the 'sacrificial' nature of the liturgy. They even think that we 'dance' during mass. As one who is vehemently opposed to the notion of 'Liturgical dance' (and BTW, I do love the Latin Mass of 1962), I must point out the fact that we do dance around the altar AFTER the dismissal, so it's technically not DURING the mass - check the book of Psalms where it speaks about King David dancing (god-forbid!) around the tabernacle, the Ark of the Covenant! If I recall, there were many local priests, (living and deceased) some of whom are detractors of the NCW, who are "liturgical dance" aficionados. In the NCW, we frown upon this notion of liturgical dance during the mass.

    It's true, there are many Catholics who lack any appreciation for the real presence. But, in the NCW, many have a renewed appreciation and devotion to the Blessed Sacrament, just ask the youth to who attend the youth scrutatio and veneration of the blessed sacrament. It's sad that Rohr and his friends do not see and do not hear the great things God has and is doing through the NCW. We don't have a monopoly on God, but we are just letting you know of the fruits that God has decided to bloom in the NCW, all to HIS glory.

    This is where the prophecy of Isaiah comes true: "they have eyes but see not, ears but hear not. . . . would that . .." NOW, if they are so fickle about the small points of the law while thousands of young people are abandoning God and the Church, do THEY have at least a partial ANSWER to these sociological, cultural and existential problems facing the Church of today?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Diana - Since you say that the NCW is an itinerary to Christian formation, how long does it take for one to be formated in the Way?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Anonymous at 9:09 pm,

      I am still very young in the Way. I have only been walking for 8 years. Someone who has been walking longer than me would probably be able to answer that question better than I can.

      The goal is to convert and become a Christian who is humble and willing to die for the faith just as the Apostles did. The goal is to become a holy saint. To be born of water and spirit can be a life long process.

      Delete
    2. Life long process? Wow. So you could be in the Way forever. I didn't think it was a permanent thing. I thought the NCW is an itinerary of formation, a stepping stone if you will, to bringing people back to the main Church. No?

      Delete
    3. Diana - If you've been in the Way for 8 years, are you still in the process of being converted?

      Delete
    4. Dear Anonymous at 11:28 pm,

      There are a few people who have finished the Way, but conversion is a life-long process for many of us. I never left the Church. I still go to Sunday Mass. I was one of those Catholics who heard the announcement from the Church pews. The difference in me today is that I became more involved in helping my parish through volunteer work. Previously, I was only a Catholic sitting on the pew every Sunday Mass. Today, I am a Catholic who still attends Sunday Mass, but much more involved in my parish through volunteer work.

      The NCW has brought in Catholics who have not been going to Mass. These are the Catholics who needed time to return to the Church, and the NCW is a stepping stone for them. In addition, we have also converted a few Protestants. One convert I know was walking in the community. He is no longer walking in the community today, but I do see him in parish Mass all the time.

      Delete
    5. Dear Anonymous at 11:29 pm,

      The word "converted" means "a change in heart" so that our stony hearts be made into a heart of flesh. Christ came to convert the hearts of men. By this definition, I am still being converted. There are times I fall and need the sacrament of reconciliation.

      Delete