Thursday, December 17, 2015
A Question To Ponder
In my last entry post, Grow up in faith and an anonymous commenter brought up an interesting point. It is true that the jungle have said that the Archbishop did not violate any civil laws. Tim Rohr stated that the Archbishop was in violation of canon law. In his blog, Tim Rohr even cited the canon laws that he believed were violated by the Archbishop. So who convinced CCOG to sue the Archbishop in a civil court? Why pursue a lawsuit in a civil court if there were no violation of any civil laws? Why did they not obtain a canon lawyer instead, considering that the jungle have consistently stated that the Archbishop was in violation of canon law?