These are some excerpts taken from the Pacific Daily News:
He issued a video message after plaintiffs initiated proceedings that sought dismissal of cases, according to his attorney. Apuron is required to agree to the dismissal, his counsel said.
He did, and the parties filed a motion that dismisses with prejudice eight clergy sex abuse cases and one defamation case against him.
It was the accusers who initiated the dismissal, which is something the jungle chose to ignore. The plaintiffs' attorney said that there's nothing to take from him because he has nothing. Bishop Anthony sold all his assets. But wait!!!
I was so sure that the accusers were not interested in money, only an apology. Yeah right! If you recall, the moment the former Archbishop declared his innocence, the accusers called him a liar and proceeded to sue him for 2 million dollars. So much for not being interested in money. 🙄 It was the money all along, including their hatred of the former Archbishop and the Neocatechumenal Way.
The nine cases that were dismissed "included eight allegations of sexual abuse dating back to the 1970s, mostly from former Hågat alter boys and one defamation case."
They backed down. They ran away. Could it be because going through a trial would expose the truth? For example, Roy Quintanilla and Walter Denton both admitted in public media that they thought they were alone. They thought no one knew. But later they admitted that they spoke to Father Jack Niland about the abuse. One of them admitted that another boy was with him. So, their stories changed. They were not alone. Furthermore, Roland Sondia and his family were very close to Father Jack. If Father Jack was truly a child molester, Roland Sondia would also be his victim. However, there are photos showing Sondia visiting Father Jack at the hospital before he passed away. Roy Quintanilla even left a positive comment on Father Jack's obituary. You can read about it here.
Roy Quintanilla, Walter Denton, and Roland Sondia claimed they were sexually abused by the former Archbishop Anthony Apuron when he was a priest. Two of them changed their story and said they told Father Jack about the abuse, but there was no record of Father Jack reporting a child sexual abuse.Imagine if all that came out in court.
Father Paul Monsignor James and crooked deacon Steve Martinez has now corrupted archbishop Ryan like they did with hon and Byrnes
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 9:14 pm,
DeleteI do not think so. Archbishop Ryan is only going by the words and terminology of what dismissal means. A dismissal does not mean that the person is innocent. By the same token, it also does not mean that the person is guilty.
The guilty verdict came from the result of the canonical trial. However, Bishop Anthony Apuron has a valid point. The fact that he was not defrocked is indeed an indication of his innocence. A person who was at his trial told me that the verdict was a political one, but he could not go into detail.
Yes, AB Ryan was following the results of the canonical trial. I also hope he follows the Vatican's results regarding Fr. Luis Camacho. Vatican said there is no evidence of Fr. Luis molesting a girl.
Delete