----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The February 7th audience with Pope Francis in the Vatican. The verdict of Cardinal Burke's trial remains unpublished. The latest accusation from his nephew. The Church on the island is hit with an avalanche of lawsuits.
SALVATORE CERNUZIO
VATICAN CITY
“Holy Father, I wanted to see you before dying.” Arriving at the Paul VI Hall in a wheelchair due to health problems, Msgr. Anthony Apuron, the Archbishop of Guam suspended amid abuse accusations, greeted Pope Francis at the end of the general audience on February 7th. Bergoglio reacted with affection, shaking the bishop’s hand and privately giving him a few words of encouragement.
Apuron had recently undergone surgery, as he revealed in a statement released in the last few weeks breaking his silence concerning the accusations of sexual abuse against minors first made against him in June of 2016—accusations which forced him to suspend himself as archbishop of the Pacific island while a canonical trial was initiated.
“As I lay sick after another surgery and I face the final judgment approaching evermore close, having lost interest in this world” reads the statement, in which the prelate specifically responds to the latest accusation from his nephew Mark Apuron, who in an interview with a Guam news outlet described an alleged assault in the bathroom of his uncle’s house during a family dinner. The incident, according to the man, happened sometime around 1989 or 1990.
With that of Mark Apuron—a relative from a part of the family rarely frequented by the archbishop, according to what he’s told his closest associates—the number of accusers now stands at five. The other four are former altar servers who claim they were abused at Our Lady of Mount Carmel parish in Guam, where then Fr. Apuron was pastor. Accusations from which have emerged some contradictions and incongruences in the course of the process conducted by five bishops and overseen by American Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, whom the pope sent to the island to investigate the case.
“God is my witness” states Apuron in the message, “I deny all allegations of sexual abuse made against me, including this last one. All these events are helping me to direct my hope towards the only righteous judge, and for this I am very thankful. I am saddened, however, by the timing of this latest accusation that alleges an act which supposedly happened in incredible circumstances.”
“These allegations have been mentored and promoted by the same source,” continues the archbishop, “and this one seems particularly timed to influence the verdict of the Vatican trial conducted by the Holy See, as a last resort out of fear that I may be exonerated.”
The “source” mentioned by Apuron in his statement which he claims is seeking to create pressure on the judges, was already discussed by Vatican Insider in an investigation published last September 20 which provoked heated reactions on the Pacific island. The former shepherd of Guam (still technically the ordinary of the archdiocese) speaks clearly of “people who have only their power agenda at heart” and “who are destroying the Church in Guam…may God have mercy on us all and save His Church from the powers of darkness.”
“I pray”, he states, “that the truth may prevail; I pray for my accusers: fill them with what they desire; as for me, ‘when I awake, I will be satisfied with Your face, oh Lord’ (Ps. 17,15).”
Apuron’s trial should have wrapped up last August with the release of a sentence but, after several events, appears to have failed to reach a conclusion. This despite the words of current apostolic administrator Bishop Michael J. Byrnes, who in a press conference months ago cited the trial’s notary as reporting that “the sentence has been determined.”
Meanwhile the situation on the island—famous for its natural beauty, evangelized nearly four centuries ago and with a 95% Catholic population—has changed radically. The Church has been hit by a wave of abuse accusations against clergy and Church employees following the senate’s passage of a law removing the statute of limitations for sexual offenses.
A dramatic escalation of sexual abuse accusations—more than 95 in the last year and a half—with substantial claims for financial reparation from the diocese. Some of them accuse priests in their nineties or ones already deceased. "Our Church is headed for bankruptcy and towards destruction,” a priest in Guam tells Vatican Insider.
Another shock to the fabric of the Guamanian church has been the Dec. 15 closure of the Redemptoris Mater seminary and the theological institute affiliated with the Pontifical Lateran University, where just a year ago 48 seminarians were studying for the priesthood, a number that had been projected to rise to 80 after other dioceses in the Pacific had announced plans to send their seminarians to study in Guam. The decision was announced by the coadjutor archbishop Byrnes, who explained that the seminary’s model was “unsustainable” for the island. But the prelate also acknowledged plans to sell the beachfront property in Yona—which has attracted the attention of foreign developers in the past—with the intention of helping cover the costs of out-of-court victim settlements.
Many of the seminarians, among them several local vocations, have relocated to other dioceses or returned to their home dioceses. Some had finished their studies and were awaiting their ordination to the diaconate. With the closure of the Theological Institute—whose establishment was requested by 31 bishops of the Pacific in 2005—twelve professors returned home, including some educated at the Lateran.
The question of the seminary and the institute has interested the ranks of the Holy See, including the Secretariat of State, for example, and Cardinal Fernando Filoni, prefect of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples—under whose jurisdiction the archdiocese of Guam falls. The cardinal sent a personal letter to Bishop Byrnes after having received a letter from four priests of the archdiocese of Agaña expressing concerns about the planned closure of the seminary and the Institute (the priests were expelled from the diocese’s presbyteral council for “insubordination” soon after).
In his letter, the prefect of Propaganda Fide reminded Byrnes of the Church’s interest in not selling the property and the prohibition placed on alienating the property based on previously stipulated conditions. The document was intended to be a private letter but was obtained by a local blog known for promoting accusations against Apuron and the Neocatechumenal Way, an ecclesial reality with a strong presence in Guam.
During a general audience in October 2017 in St. Peter’s Square, a canonical recourse signed by approximately 25 priests, lawyers, and other prominent figures from Guam was hand-delivered to the Pope. The signers appealed to the Pope to personally intervene regarding Byrnes’ decision, which, it read, “has inflicted a spiritual, moral and physical harm upon the faithful of Guam as a result of his actions without respect for canon law.” The appeal --multiple sources report-- is currently under review by some dicasteries of the Curia.
Besides closing the Redemptoris Mater, Byrnes has meanwhile reshaped the diocese’s bodies, replacing the members of the cemetery board, the presbyteral council, the finance council, the college of consultors and the metropolitan tribunal. His dismissals include several Chamorro (the name given to local natives) priests as well as those affiliated with the Neocatechumenal Way, and in the case of the tribunal, replacing them with—among others—clergy from the Philippines. Reinstated to all the advisory boards was the controversial Msgr. James Benavente, whom we reported on in the previous article.
The latest string of appointments came just a few weeks after an hours-long visit by Filipino Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle to the island on Dec. 17, 2017.
I wonder if the media will contact AB Byrnes and ask him questions regarding the news in Vatican Insider. They might ask him how a private letter of a cardinal addressed only to him managed to get published in a blog.
ReplyDeleteAll the problems the Archdiocese of Agana is going through points to one man. If he speaks the truth why be afraid to come home and clear his name. The article states that 25 priests, lawyers and prominent people signed a petition for a canonical recourse in support of Apuron. The NCW communities on Guam, some clergy members and some prominent people of this island can fight to clear Apuron's name. Wny haven't they come out in full force or have they thrown Apuron under the bus.
ReplyDeleteDiana, you put a lot of emphasis on Tim Rohr, don't forget that it was the traditional Catholics who pounded the pavement.
DeleteDear Anonymous at 11:06 pm,
DeleteOpen your eyes. The article stated:
"Accusations from which have emerged some contradictions and incongruences in the course of the process conducted by five bishops and overseen by American Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke, whom the pope sent to the island to investigate the case."
Someone under the last thread said that it is possible that some information may have been leaked out in Rome to the jungle that Archbishop Apuron would be exonerated. That may explain the suspicious timing of Mark Apuron, and the desperation in Rohr, trying to demonize the Archbishop at the Rotary Club.
If Rohr can obtain a private letter addressed to Archbishop Byrnes, would it be a surprise if he got information from his Italian connections about the verdict? After all, why the desperation in trying to demonize Archbishop Apuron?
Dear Anonymous at 11:19 pm,
DeleteThose traditional Catholics only repeated everything Rohr said in his blog. Even the seminary report that CCOG put together came from Rohr's blog. Do you not remember? CCOG put together a seminary report WITHOUT visiting the seminary. So, where did they get the information? They got it all from Rohr's blog. See the weblink below:
https://neocatechemunal.blogspot.com/2016/08/ccogs-press-release_30.html
Diana there is a leak in the Vatican because Timmy is now talking about the lastampa article and he’s showing pictures of the meeting
ReplyDeleteTim is scared, he doesn't care how far he has to go in order to impose his narrative, he doesn't care about his family, his children, his spouse... all he cares is that he doesn't go to jail for 'deliberately' defaming Apuron on behalf of the Benaventes or whomever is pulling his strings... he is the scapegoat of the real villains... Rohr is just a tool for those that rule the island to get their way... in business terms, Rohr is an 'undertaker' the one that does all the dirty work... his motivation is money/power, I am just startled at the extent to which he will go, i.e. his family... I mean, anyone that puts power/money over family has some serious issues in life... thank God there is reconciliation in the Catholic Church and as Christians we can forgive, but he is not backing down, the madness continues, the damage he is inflicting to himself and to his loved-ones is beyond anything I have ever witnessed. We need to pray for him and his family.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous, so why don't you tell us if you are so sure?! Whoever is pulling Rohr's strings? You made me very curious!
DeleteGrow up in faith - if you can tell me who paid the Russian Spy to fabricate dirt on Trump, you can easily find out who is subsidizing Rohr. Apuron's version of the story implies that there is a deep political corruption in the island... and if you are 'old enough' as Apuron is, you know who he is talking about.
DeleteIf you say is true Ann. 2:48, call AAA back to Guam and face the truth of his actions. If he did do it, as alleged, let the wheels of justice roll. If not there is nothing to worry about.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous at 7:24am
DeleteI prefer to think that Apuron believes that in Guam he will not get a fair trial, according to his side of the story there are political forces bigger than a public court, that also explains why he asked the Vatican to intervene and the Canonical trial was their response... In the meantime, we are all waiting, patiently for the verdict. I don't know, nor do I presume to know, in such a delicate case, why would anyone claim to know what they don't know? Tim claims the verdict is guilty... why would he do that? his own credibility is at stake. Anyways, I pray for Apuron and I pray for his enemies. Pray for the truth to come up, we must. But, I will not believe any allegations neither anything Tim may presumptuously claim.
Dear Anonymous, are you questioning the constitutional court system? Who are exactly the "political forces bigger than a public court"? Are you claiming that unconstitutional influence is exerted on the judges on Guam? You better know that the public court system works as an independent institution and takes influence from nowhere and from nobody, except the constitution/ organic act!
DeleteWhen you question the fairness of the court of law, you instill doubt in the citizens about the law system and the democratic order of the land! Are you rebelling against the rule of law and the constitutional order?!
I am old enough to know that islands are always ruled by a few families that are in power. Only naive and young people believe that 'the public cour system' is flawless and impervious to corruption. FYI: old people like me and Apuron know, by articles of faith, that we all suffer from original sin. Wherease, within the Church we recognize our weaknesses, in the 'political' world they all present themselves as unblemished idealized (almost divine) personalities (think Rohr)... and everyone that has enough experience knows that is a load of hypocrisy. Lawyers and Politicians have as much credibilities as 2nd-hand-car-salesmenn... so spear me your 'rule of law'/'democratic order'... Just look at the corruption in DC and you will get but a hint of what is going on in Guam and then some.
DeleteApuron, who is smarter than his enemies, asked Rome to intervene. That is his version of the story... On the other side, your version, the way you praise the democracy in Guam, the glorification of the court system, the romantic description of the island politics, reveal to me that you yourself are part of the island corrupt forces or... you are completely immature.
Are you saying the democratic order of law and justice cannot be trusted?! This sounds odd from a self-proclaimed anonymous. If you know a crime and you don't report it, then you are an accomplice. If you don't know a crime then what are you talking about?!
DeleteI don't know what corruption you are accusing the US government in DC of! Could you please elaborate? Are you saying the federal government is corrupt and maintains corrupt democracy in Washington DC? Based on what?
Dear Grow up in faith,
DeleteI have always said that our justice system is not perfect, but it is better than that of a totalitarian government. The canonical trial, which Rohr finds irrelevant, is actually better than the civil trial in Guam. In fact, it may even have an impact on the civil trial. The canonical trial in Rome is considered a valid trial.
Is Rohr "Unclean..Unclean"?? Standind in front of Rotarians poissoning their minds while they eat and drink...Jew and Greeks and the Church...causing scandal...
ReplyDeleteAsk the Lord if He wills to cure the leporsy.. I'm pretty shure He wills it. All you gotta do is ask.....He is full of mercy......
Jews and Greeks and leprosy...?! Who on earth they are?
DeleteResearch the Jews and Greeks in relation to Christians in scripture.
DeleteLeprosy is a sickness that can be looked at as similar to our sins in a spiritual sense....
Rohr is neither a Jew nor a Greek. He has no leprosy either. What on earth are you talking about?
DeleteThe medical record of every citizen is private and cannot be disclosed to the public. Keeping privacy is a human right that you cannot violate. Why are you dwelling in lawless speculation?
OMG....you can't even relate scripture to whats happening in your life....no wonder the word passes you by....think deeper...open your heart spiritually....
DeleteI guess its hard enough to announce the "gospel" to pagans....
@annon 12:44PM. I don't care to know rohr's medical condition.. whatever kind of sickness or health condition he has...never was dwelling on it.. was speaking about the past Sunday's reading....
DeleteSorry you can't relate.....
It's a good thing that Mr. Cernuzio is in the Way, so he can publish the truth about us.
ReplyDeleteHilarious, 10:10
DeleteGosh! any reporter that repeats what the Vatican Insider reported or that reports on NCW events is now labelled an NCW fanatic... ALARM ALARM ALAM....
DeleteRELAS!!! the guy is just trying to earn a living... does Rohr really has to dehumanize, demonize and terrorize everyone that doesn't agree with him? Grow up!!!
Diana did you hear what happened to the gift shop at the cathedral it got shutdown don’t know why but father Paul just announced it during the mass
ReplyDeleteDear God is one,
DeleteThat is okay. I can always shop at Padre Pio or even go online at Amazon.com.
Its good that the gift shop closed and finances looked at....taking it over from when timmy ran it....might uncover something??
DeleteAnd Diana guampdn will not put the lastampa article in their paper is because of sondia since he works there to
ReplyDeleteDiana, I submitted you 4 quotes from CCC. Why did not you publish? I am sorry if you think it went to the wrong topic, but I think it could fit here. I only try to help with the facts.
ReplyDeleteCCC 633 has it this way: Jesus did not descend into hell to deliver the damned, nor to destroy the hell of damnation.
CCC 1021 states very clearly: Death puts an end to human life as the time open to either accepting or rejecting the divine grace manifested in Christ.
CCC 1022 has a stern warning: Each man receives his eternal retribution in his immortal soul at the very moment of his death, in a particular judgment that refers his life to Christ: either entrance into the blessedness of heaven-through a purification or immediately, -- or immediate and everlasting damnation.
CCC 1033 clarifies even more: To die in mortal sin without repenting and accepting God's merciful love means remaining separated from him for ever by our own free choice. This state of definitive self-exclusion from communion with God and the blessed is called "hell."
It was for your comment that "You say that Christ preached only to the righteous in the land of the dead. Then why was he preaching to the sinners on earth? If Christ preached to the sinners on earth, it stands to reason that he would also be preaching to the sinners in the land of the dead. ... After all, it is the sinner who needs saving... Christ descended to Hell to preach the good news to the dead so that like St. Dismas (who was an unrighteous thief to begin with), they would also believe in him and have salvation..."
My feeling was that St. Dimas, the "good thief" repented on the cross when he was still breathing. So he was saved by the Lord, alleluia! He went with Jesus to Paradise. But if you cannot breathe anymore, your soul is not in your body! Then who are you? How can you believe in Christ without your body?
Dear Joanne, as Diana called it into your attention, this thread is going on in another topic. But you quotes are all relevant and I would like to reflect on them in context of salvation of dead souls in hell.
DeleteDear Joanne, we had the statement that Jesus descended to hell to preach His resurrection to the souls so that they begin to believe in Him and get salvation. This would mean one could get salvation as the soul of a dead person in hell. Diana explained that nobody should be left out, not even the souls of the dead.
DeleteBut your quote of CCC 633 and 1021 clarifies that this is not the case. You found the appropriate paragraphs dear Joanne! The grace manifested in Christ cannot be accepted in hell. Those who reject the very concept of particular judgment would typically argue referring to the souls in heaven waiting for salvation. However, there is no salvation in hell! Hell is the place of damnation. This is in CCC 1022.
The souls of the saints of the Old Testament times who repented their sin while on earth sojourned in hell temporarily only, until the death of Jesus opened the gate of heaven for them. These were the righteous who otherwise would have ascended to heaven already, but because of the sin of Adam and Eve, they were not allowed to do so!
Again, those who reject the Catholic teaching of propitiatory sacrifice of Jesus on the cross, would typically argue that redemption is not coming from the death of Jesus, but from His resurrection. But this is wrong! The Catholic Church teaches something else. Jesus freed the prisoner saints in hell by His death on Good Friday even before His resurrection on Easter Sunday!
Correction: Those who reject the very concept of particular judgment would typically argue referring to the souls in HELL waiting for salvation.
DeleteDear Critiquer,
DeleteThis is what the CCC 633 stated. Notice the word "Hell" in it.
CCC 633 Scripture calls the abode of the dead, to which the dead Christ went down, "hell" - Sheol in Hebrew or Hades in Greek - because those who are there are deprived of the vision of God.
That is the "HELL" that Christ went down to. In Hebrew, it is called "Sheol." In Greek, it is called "Hades." Sometimes, we call it the "land of the dead."
The Hell of damnation is a different Hell. The Book of Revelations calls it the "Lake of Fire." The Catechism of the Catholic Church calls it the "Eternal fire."
CCC 1035 The teaching of the Church affirms the existence of hell and its eternity. Immediately after death the souls of those who die in a state of mortal sin descend into hell, where they suffer the punishments of hell, "eternal fire." The chief punishment of hell is eternal separation from God, in whom alone man can possess the life and happiness for which he was created and for which he longs.
Romans 3:25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
Why do you think the Bible specifically said sins of the past and not "future" sins????? Christ preached to those in the Land of the Dead, which is called Hell. Those who are damned were already damned. Christ did not preach to them.
As I said before, the problem with this debate is the terminology. You think the dead is the same as the damned. You define "righteousness" as people who have sins including the Original sin. And when Christ descended into Hell, you do not know enough Catholicism to understand that the "Hell" he descended into was the land of the dead and not the one of eternal damnation. The Apostles Creed clearly stated that Jesus descended into Hell. But if you had studied it further like we do in the Way, you would have understood that this "Hell" he descended into was the "land of the dead." See my previous comments. Did you notice that a few times, I have stated "Land of the Dead?" And yes, this is Catholicism.
DeleteThe Apostles Creed:
I believe in God, the Father Almighty, Creator of heaven and earth; and in Jesus Christ, His only Son, our Lord: Who was conceived by the Holy Spirit, born of the Virgin Mary; suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, died and was buried. He descended into hell; the third day He rose again from the dead; He ascended into heaven, is seated at the right hand of God the Father Almighty; from thence He shall come to judge the living and the dead. I believe in the Holy Spirit, the Holy Catholic Church, the communion of Saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and life everlasting. Amen.