We received a couple of good news in last night's Advent Announcement. The first good news is that Carmen Hernandez will be declared the title "Servant of God" by the Vatican on December 4, 2022. She is getting closer to the canonization of sainthood. You can find the information here.
On July 19, 2021, after the five years established by the current legislation, the petition for the opening of the Cause of Canonization of Carmen Hernández, initiator together with Kiko Argüello, of the Neocatechumenal Way, was presented to the Archbishop of Madrid, Cardinal D. Carlos Osoro.
After a preliminary investigation to verify the presence of a solid, spontaneous and well extended reputation of sanctity and of signs, by the diocesan tribunal; after also having made the pertinent canonical consultations with the Dicastery of the Causes of Saints of the Holy See, with the bishops of the ecclesiastical Province and with the faithful of this Diocese, the Archbishop of Madrid, D. Carlos Osoro, has accepted this request and will preside over the “Official Opening of the Cause of Beatification and Canonization of Carmen Hernández Barrera”.
This joyful ecclesial event will take place on December 4, 2022, the second Sunday of Advent, at 6:00 p.m., at the Francisco de Vitoria University in Madrid.
Those invited include the communities lead by Kiko, Fr. Mario and Ascensión in Italy, Spain and France, all the itinerant catechists of the first teams of the nations, all the rectors and vice-rectors of the Redemptoris Mater seminaries of the world and the ordained priests of the seminaries of Rome and Madrid.
Jane Doe, you got that right! We see that in the US where conservative speech are being censored while hate speech from liberals are being tolerated. All this nonsense comes from somewhere, and my guess are the colleges taken over by liberals
I agree. People in our society did not simply wake up one day and decide that Donald Trump is the epitome of systematic racism and should not run for President of the United States. Members of BLM, ANTIFA, and some members of the Democratic Party were brainwashed into thinking this way. They did not simply wake up one day and say, "Okay! Enough is enough! Donald Trump is a racist and is the very epitome of systematic racism in America because he is against immigration." Trump has always stated that he is against ILLEGLAL immigration. He is not opposed to immigrants who enter the United States legally.
Hatred is taught. It is not something a child is born with. And unfortunately, in many of America's universities, Socialism and Marxism are promoted while traditional conservative values are being suppressed. Universities and probably even high schools are where these ideologies are being taught. There is always a root cause of where all this hatred is coming from. Is this not the reason why the LGBTQ+ community are promoting the teachings (or should I say "indoctrination") of Critical Race Theory into the elementary schools, where children are most impressionable. The video below points out the problem that America is facing in some of its universities. When a person or an institution demonizes and persecutes another person (in this case Trump) or a group of people (in this case the MAGA crowd who voted for Trump), they are simply causing division and hatred. Disagreeing with a person is not hate speech nor violence. Apparently, some of the educational system in America needs to be revamped to foster civil dialogue and learn the difference between speech and violence.
Donald Trump is one of the greatest Presidents of the United States. He has indeed accomplished a lot during his one-term as President. However, not everyone likes his personality or his character. He is arrogant and has a lot of pride. Recently, he made negative remarks of the Governor of Florida and the Governor of Virginia, both of whom are Republicans. Both Governors recognize Trump’s achievements and understood that his policies worked for the country. Trump has also announced that he will be running again as President of the U.S. in 2024. One of my friends supports Trump and would vote for him again in 2024. That friend asked my opinion of him. This is my opinion:
While he was President, his policies were a benefit to the country, and he did put America first. Unfortunately, his arrogance has earned him a lot of enemies including among those of his own party. Saying negative remarks about Ron De Santis and Glenn Youngkin is not going to get him re-elected by the people of Florida and Virginia. Nevertheless, Trump seems to have a lot of affect on his enemies that they cannot forget him and continue to persecute him to this day. If Trump were elected in 2024, he can continue to do great things for America, but I do not think he can unify the American people. There are people whose hatred of him runs so deep that they have become so obsessed with seeking his downfall regardless of the good things he has done.
With that said, I am sure that there are many Donald Trumps out there. In fact, I know one person in my community who have the same personality. Yet, is this not the reason why we walk in a community and attend Mass....to put out the old man and allow the new man to emerge in us? I can say for certain that my brother in my community have changed a great deal that I do not see much arrogance in the brother. Then again, could it be that I changed and have learned to accept the brother’s character? Perhaps, we both changed in our walk, but one thing is for certain, we are still struggling with pride. Is this not true with many people regardless of whether they are in the NCW or not? Pride is the worst of the deadliest sins. No one can change Trump’s attitude and personality. That is up to him to change, and he can change with God’s grace. In the same way, Trump cannot change his enemies’ hatred of him.
In the Guam Daily Post, Guam Chief Judge Frances Tydingco-Gatewood ordered the attorneys representing the Holy See to ask Pope Francis if he can resolve the Guam clergy sex abuse case rather than settling it in court. The case comes from a lawsuit filed by "D.M." who accused the Vatican of being responsible for former Archbishop Anthony Apuron for sexually assaulting him in the 1990s while he was a student of Father Duenas Memorial School. My first question is how was the Vatican responsible for the sexual assault of D.M.? D.M. kept the sexual assault to himself. He never told his parents about it nor did he report it to the police or school principal. So, how was the Pope responsible? Did D.M. expect the Pope to read his mind? The accusation lacks any grounds. On the other hand, D.M. has a responsibility to report the crime himself, which he failed to do. At the very least, he should have reported it to his parents.
There was only one such report in Guam of a priest who was accused of child sexual abuse. A victim did come forward and reported Father Brouillard to the Guam Police Department. According to my blog post, dated July 19, 2019:
And, a self-described, 30 year veteran of the Guam police force, who called into my radio show, stated that he had arrested a Catholic priest who molested a young alter boy on Guam. He stated that after his arrest, the priest admitted to molesting multiple victims on Guam.
According to the retired police officer, this entire incident was covered up by former Archbishop Flores. The alleged offending priest was, according to the retired officer, promptly shipped off-island shortly after his arrest, and never faced justice on Guam.
So, did the Guam Police Department make any effort in getting Father Brouillard back into Guam for prosecution? Here, we have a very brave young man who reported the sexual abuse to the police many years ago. Brouillard also admitted that he molested multiple victims when he was arrested by GPD. So, did GPD contact any of those victims to add more charges to the priest? So many unanswered questions. This negligence is also found in Pornchai's story when he reported his sexual abuse to a school counselor and other authorities. His story was ignored, and his step father, Richard Baily, continued to abuse him and his brother. If the school counselor and other authorities whom Pornchai reported the abuse had done their job, Richard Baily would have been in jail and Pornchai's mother would most likely be alive today. Had GPD and other authorities had done their job, Father Brouillard would have been prosecuted and in prison, which would stop any further sexual abuse of boys done by this priest.
According to Father Gordon's post in his blog, which I previously published, it says that Guam has 103 cold cases. One of those cold cases involved Pornchai's mother, Wannee Baily. Attorney Clair Farr has reached out to the District Attorney in Maine. As a result, an investigation was opened, and Richard Alan Bailey was arrested, found guilty, and imprisoned for child sexual assault. This same attorney also reached out to law enforcement in Guam and to the Attorney General's office regarding the cold case of Wannee Baily. There appears to be evidence that Richard Baily also murdered his wife. Richard Baily is charged with child sexual abuse. He could be charged with the murder of his wife, but there was no response from the Chief of Police and the Attorney General's office in Guam when Attorney Clair Farr contacted them. Again, another embarrassment for Guam.
It should also be noted that the large majority of child sexual abuse done in Guam occurs OUTSIDE the Catholic Church. Just look at the newspaper headlines. Where is the outrage of the people when child sexual abuse are being carried out by family members and friends inside the home? These family members and/or friends are being brought through the justice system, and there are no picket signs declaring them guilty without a trial. On the other hand, people came out declaring priests (most of whom have been dead for a long time) guilty without the due process of a trial.
The following article was written on Father Gordon's blog, and it pertains to Guam. You can find the article here. This is an embarrassment to our law enforcement agency.
The U.S. Territorial Island of Guam; has 103 unsolved cold case homicides. The victim in Case No. 70 was the mother of Pornchai Moontri and it needs a new set of eyes.
September 14, 2022 by Fr. Gordon MacRae
Important Note from Father MacRae: It has not escaped my notice that this is being posted on the Feast of the Exultation of the Cross. That is most fitting.This is an unusual post for us, but a necessary one. It tells a story that has deeply impacted our lives and it has been a long time in the making. Please note that portions of this account may be disturbing. I have done all I can to minimize such content without minimizing the story itself. This post is longer than most, but it is a mesmerizing account with no part that I could justly omit. If you have never shared a post of mine on social media or with others, please share this one.
+ + +
The Island of Guam, which at 212 square miles is the largest of the Mariana Islands in the Western Pacific, is today home to about 170,000 people. About 80% are indigenous Chamorro or of Filipino or other Pacific Islands descent. Guam also hosts one of the most strategic U.S. military bases in the Pacific, Andersen Air Force Base. In 1950, United States citizenship was conferred upon all permanent residents of this unincorporated U.S. territorial island.
As in the rest of the U.S., the citizens of Guam elect their Executive and Legislative branches of government. Guam has a federal judiciary appointed by the U.S. president, and superior court judges and an Attorney General appointed by the governor. Guam also has a phenomenon plaguing its law enforcement system. Writing for the Guam Daily Post (November 7, 2021) reporter Nick Delgado penned an article about the extraordinary number of Guam’s unsolved ‘cold case’ homicides.
One of these unsolved cases, number 70 on a list of 103, is that of Wannee Laporn Bailey, the mother of Pornchai Moontri. She was murdered in Guam at age 47 on April 18, 2000. I first wrote of this in “Human Trafficking: Thailand to America and a Cold Case in Guam,” an article that lays out the back story of Pornchai’s life before being sent to prison at age 18.
Earlier articles that I wrote about Pornchai’s life garnered some attention from around the world, including from some who had formed erroneous conclusions about him and his offense. What I wrote gave context to a nagging gap in his 1993 trial. That gap was the six years between his arrival in the United States at age 12 and the offense that sent him to prison at age 18.
After reading my articles, Clare Farr, a Trademarks attorney with an Intellectual Property law firm in Western Australia, alerted police and the District Attorney in Maine that something essential was amiss in Pornchai’s trial: an account of six years of trauma prior to his crime. A detective and an Assistant District Attorney then went to interview Pornchai 26 years into his prison sentence.
Then they interviewed Pornchai’s brother, Priwan, two years older. These interviews, now heavily corroborated, resulted in a 2017 warrant for the arrest of Richard Alan Bailey at his Westlake, Oregon home. He was indicted on 40 felony counts of gross sexual assault, charges in which Pornchai and his brother, Priwan, were victims as young immigrant children transported from rural Thailand to the city of Bangor, Maine in 1985. A long held and highly destructive secret thus ascended into the light.
Richard Bailey Brought to Justice — Sort Of
On September 12, 2018, Richard Alan Bailey entered a plea of “no contest” but was found guilty in a Maine Court on all 40 felony sexual assault charges. A testament to the nature of these proceedings was that of Pornchai himself whose testimony was read into the court record by Assistant District Attorney Alice Clifford:
“Your Honor, Richard [Bailey’s] actions have had a catastrophic impact on me, and I believe it is important for the Court to understand this in the context of my life history. I am an inmate of New Hampshire Prison for Men. I am in prison because when I was only 18, I killed a man and I have been in custody ever since. In 1993, I was sentenced to a term of 45 years in prison. I am now 46 years of age and have spent 60 percent of my life in prison.
“What Richard [Bailey] did to me began when I was only 12-years-old. The few years that I have spent in his “care” — and “care” is in quotations — were the worst years of my life. Worse even than the last 26 years in prison.
“I accept responsibility for the crime I committed. However, the responsibility for turning me into an angry, alienated and despairing young man who killed a man belongs to Richard Bailey. And he has never faced up to what he did to me. Nor has he faced up to what he did to my brother and our mother, Wannee.
“I was born in Thailand, and at the age of two I was abandoned by my parents and then raised by my grandmother living on a small farm in the north of Thailand. When I was 11, my mother came to retrieve me and my brother and told us that she had married an American, that she would take us to live with him in the United States, that we would have a great life, and want for nothing.
“We came to America in December of 1985 when I was 12. Within two weeks, Richard Bailey began to sexually assault me. The first time was when I was lying on the floor covered with a blanket while I was watching television. Richard placed himself under the blanket and began to fondle me. I was terrified.
“On another occasion … he got in the shower with me and began to explain male physiology while fondling me. At other times he would make me watch pornographic material. It wasn’t long before things graduated to sodomy. He would do such things when my mother was not in the vicinity. He would take me for drives or go camping and he would sodomize me. I hated it. I hated him. I could not speak English, but Richard was clear that if I told about the sexual assaults there would be dire repercussions.
“At home, Richard was a tyrant and a drunken bully who was physically abusive to me, my mother and my brother. We lived a life of fear, intimidation, and violence. No one was allowed to speak Thai in the house and we were not permitted to have friends come over … He completely controlled our lives …
“I first ran away from him to escape the abuse at age 12, only to be returned to him by the police. I spoke very little English and wasn’t able to tell the police that Richard had been sexually assaulting me. I could not tell my mother at that time because Richard threatened what would happen to her if I told.
“Richard Bailey sexually assaulted me more times than he is charged with … I ran away again and again, living in juvenile detention centers, the homes of friends, or finding a place of shelter wherever I could. Sometimes my mother would bring me food when I was living under a bridge [In Bangor, pictured below]. When I had no food, I would steal. When I was caught I was sent to juvenile detention where I told counselors about the abuse and they reported it.”
— End of Transcript Excerpts
Justice Delayed — Repeatedly
Because Pornchai was a prisoner when Richard Bailey was finally brought before the Court, the D.A feared putting Pornchai on the witness stand in a trial. So Bailey was offered a plea deal, and like most guilty defendants, he accepted it. For 40 felony counts of child sexual abuse, Bailey would serve no time in prison and 18 years on probation. After registering on the State of Maine Sex Offender Registry, he quietly returned to his lakeside Oregon house.
Over the six years when Pornchai was 12 to 18 years of age leading up to his own offense, Maine officials received reports about the sexual abuse of Pornchai. These interventions were inexplicably ineffective. Official reports from the Maine Youth Center and Department of Human Services should have resulted in a protection order for Pornchai, and investigation of Richard Bailey, and criminal charges, but none of that happened. Here are excerpts:
November 8, 1989: “Pornchai alleges that his stepfather, Rick Bailey, perpetrated sexual and physical abuse upon him. [He] is concerned that Mr. Bailey will take out revenge on his mother.”
November 10, 1989: “Pornchai has trouble explaining himself in English, so it was hard to get more details from him. Also, he is protective of his mother.”
December 14, 1989: “[The sexual abuse] totally destroyed boy’s faith in family — mother made aware — did nothing. Boy began to habitually run away. Boy terrified some type of revenge will be taken out on mother.”
December 21, 1989: “Pornchai has opened up to me information about sexual abuse by his stepfather. This was a significant breakthrough with Pornchai since he has been holding this in … At this point we have notified the Dept. of Human Services.”
February 15, 1990: “In terms of the allegations of sexual abuse, Pornchai has to go to Bangor. He will have to make a tape or prepare some kind of testimony and he is having a very difficult time even thinking about the events that occurred.”
April 26, 1990: “Pornchai has been going through some major crises in his He went to court in Bangor and was made a ward of the State. His allegations of sexual abuse do not seem to have progressed … His mother was in to visit him and told him that she did not want him to go through with this issue any further. He fears that he will be harming his mother if he proceeds with this.”
From an undated Interagency Protocol Report: “Boy states that stepfather started touching him, talking “dirty,” showing porno movies and progressively became more abusive. Made Pornchai perform oral sex on him. He would pull his hair and slap him if he refused. He would set up situations where he would have Pornchai alone. Stated if he told anyone his mother would suffer.”
The record contains dozens of similar reports of violent sexual abuse, some much more graphic and disturbing. Sheriff’s deputies once found Pornchai escaping Bailey’s house by running along railroad tracks out of Bangor, but they did not understand his protests as they forcibly returned him to Richard Bailey. They wrote a report of their suspicions, however, but nothing happened.
Pornchai’s mother found blood on his bedding and underwear, but Bailey kept her in a silent state of poverty, desperation and helplessness according to statements from neighbors and others. One neighbor confronted Bailey after seeing 12-year-old Pornchai beaten and bloody. Bailey beat Pornchai again while forbidding him from interacting with others. A school nurse documented suspicions that Pornchai was sexually and physically abused, but she was advised to keep silent and not get involved.
Pornchai’s Offense
From there on Pornchai spent most of his childhood living on the streets of Bangor, a broken young man. Harassed by a Bangor gang, he carried a knife for protection. At the 2018 plea deal hearing for Richard Bailey, the D.A. read again from Pornchai’s Statement:
“A few months after I turned 18, I was involved in an incident at the local supermarket and I killed a man when I was highly intoxicated. I was tackled by Michael Scott McDowell, a man having a much larger frame than myself, and in a kneejerk reaction I took my knife and stabbed him and he later died. It was unintentional. At the moment I stabbed at him my mind was Richard Bailey on top of me and I never wanted to be in that situation again.”
It was not up to Pornchai Moontri to investigate and prosecute Bailey. That was the job of the State of Maine and the State failed him miserably. Pornchai was a traumatized child who neither spoke nor understood English when Bailey’s assaults commenced. After all the above interviews with DHS and Maine Youth Center staff, sheriff’s deputies interviewed Richard Bailey — and him alone. In his response, he gave them a well-rehearsed story about having lovingly opened his home to Pornchai, who doubled-down on his youthful shunning of a kind stepfather’s discipline by making false claims against him.
The sheriff’s deputies who interviewed Bailey in 1990 never questioned Pornchai, his brother, their mother, or any of the Maine Youth Center staff who made the above reports. This was not a case with dubious claims of repressed or recovered memory. No one can rightly claim today that sexual abuse just wasn’t on the radar in 1990. At the same time the above reports were made, a high-profile panic about sexual abuse by Catholic priests was brewing right next door to Maine in New Hampshire.
At Pornchai’s own trial in 1993, Bailey feared for what Pornchai might divulge to police and the Court so he took matters into his own hands. He wrote a letter to presiding Judge Margaret Kravchuk. He presented himself as a caring stepfather whose discipline was rejected by this by this wild child who turned on him. He blamed influence from Pornchai’s drug-infested and delinquent friends in order to deflect blame in case Pornchai pointed a finger at Bailey. These friends today describe that letter as “a pack of lies.”
Meanwhile, while held in Maine’s Penobscot County Jail waiting trial at age 18, Pornchai’s mother, Wannee, came to him, sent by Richard Bailey to deliver a message about what would happen to her if Pornchai told anyone about Bailey’s abuse of him. So he remained silent, refusing to participate in his own defense. Bailey’s egregious witness tampering took place right under the noses of Maine officials. Pornchai’s fear for the safety of his mother was well founded. The evidence for that loomed just over a distant horizon.
Getting Away with Murder
Wannee’s life had been a hard one even before meeting Bailey in Bangkok in the later 1970s. She was but 19 years old when she was abandoned in the rural north of Thailand by her first husband while raising two-year-old Priwan and still carrying the unborn Pornchai. In 1975, out of the desperation of poverty, she left them when they were two and four years of age hoping that her extended family would care for them.
Wannee traveled nine hours to Bangkok in search of work. Her first job was in construction. This small and frail young woman carried two large cement buckets on a pole as an indentured servant earning her meals and fifty cents a day. She later worked as a cook.
Richard Bailey had been a civilian helicopter pilot in Vietnam, but frequented the Bangkok area when the war ended. In the later 1970s, he and Wannee met. They married in Bangkok on February 14, 1980, then relocated to Bailey’s hometown of Bangor, Maine. There, with Wannee now in a foreign land where she spoke no English, he controlled her every move and would not allow her to pursue citizenship. He obtained work for her as a hotel chambermaid, but tightly controlled her income. Bailey knew that she left two young sons in Thailand, but he had no interest in them until they were 11 and 13 years old. Then, in 1985, he sent Wannee to retrieve them.
Two years after Pornchai was sentenced to prison, Richard Bailey sold his home in Maine and relocated with Wannee to the Western Pacific Island of Guam. Bailey secured work with the Federal Aviation Administration as an air traffic controller. They purchased a home in Talofofo, a small seaside town in the south of Guam. His life there was privileged, secure, and far from the wreckage he left behind in Maine.
The next few years passed by in relative comfort for Bailey living a new life in Guam, but Wannee grew increasingly troubled by all that had transpired. Finally, in late 1999, she became resolved to leave Bailey and filed for divorce in a Guam court. On February 14, 2000, a divorce decree was finalized with a judgment against Bailey which included the following provisions:
That Bailey pay Wannee monthly alimony payments of $1,000;
That the jointly owned home in Talofofo be sold and the proceeds be divided equally,
That upon Bailey reaching the age of 59½, he pay to Wannee $8,000 as her share of his IRA; and
That Bailey pay Wannee $25,000 from a money market account in May 2000.
Wannee had built up the courage to leave and return to Thailand, but both her sons were in their 20s living in Maine. Pornchai was in his eighth year in prison where he was stranded with no family help or support at all. While in Thailand, Wannee used what little funds she had to secure a small parcel of land and began to have a house built for her and her sons whom she hoped to redeem from the past. However, back in Guam Richard Bailey simply ignored court orders for payments to Wannee. So she planned a fateful return to Guam to seek justice.
On her way back to Guam, Wannee visited Pornchai in prison in Maine. She apologized for not believing him as a child, and for the years of torment he suffered. She told him that she had divorced Bailey and was going to expose all that he had done to her, Pornchai, and Priwan. But first, she said, she was returning to Guam to seek enforcement of the divorce decree. She had no idea she was going to her death.
Weeks later, while alone in a Maine prison, Pornchai received word from Richard Bailey’s sister in Maine that Wannee had died in Guam. Pornchai was left with an impression that his mother had accidentally fallen from a high cliff, but his instincts knew better. He asked Bailey’s sister, “Did Richard kill my mother” There was a moment’s pause before she answered, “I don’t know.”
After all the wreckage of the past, this news was devastating for Pornchai. He gave up on his life and ended up serving the next several years in the maddening cruelty of Maine State Prison’s “SuperMax” solitary confinement unit. (PBS Frontline produced a video documentary on Maine’s solitary confinement.) Pornchai had surpassed nearly all other prisoners in the amount of time spent there. Then, in 2005, he was transferred to the neighboring New Hampshire State Prison where he spent the next 15 years with me.
Over these years, as the story of Pornchai’s life unfolded, I wrote several additional articles. Clare Farr, Pornchai’s advocate in Western Australia, joined me in an effort to investigate. Among the many inroads we made was one to officials in Guam who released Wannee’s April 2000 autopsy report. It revealed that her cause of death was ruled a homicide.
Wannee had been beaten to death according to the autopsy report. Her broken ribs caused devastating injuries to inner organs and a broken wrist revealed defensive wounds. Wannee was 47 years old at the time she died. Pornchai sat in our cell and wept openly upon learning the truth about the death of his mother.
Cold Case Homicide
According to Guam police statements, Richard Bailey had reported that Wannee was on the Island visiting with him, but went missing. Two days later, Bailey reported filing Wannee’s body himself. Because this technically remains an open cold case homicide, though now dormant for 22 years, Guam police have seemed reluctant to provide further information.
However, an interview with Wannee’s niece conducted by Clare Farr in 2016, revealed that Wannee telephoned her from Guam on the day she died. She said Wannee was frantic, saying that Richard had threatened her. Richard could be heard shouting in the background. Wannee told her niece in Thai, “If I am found dead, Richard did it and I want you to demand an investigation.”
Bailey never did pay Wannee the money she was owed in alimony, or the money due to her from his IRA and the money market account and the sale of their jointly owned Guam property. And on her death, he should have paid the money due to the executor of Wannee’s estate. However, Bailey never told the executor that there were court orders in place and that he owed money to Wannee, so the money never went into Wannee’s estate for distribution to Pornchai and Priwan, who had been Bailey’s victims of abuse. This money would have been of crucial importance to Pornchai tasked with starting life over after he emerged from prison. He returned to Thailand penniless with nothing but the clothes he was wearing.
None of the above — not the background about Richard’s crimes against Pornchai and Priwan that he desperately wanted covered up, nor the telephone call from Wannee to her niece — was known to Guam police at the time they first investigated the homicide of Wannee in 2000. We believe that there is now sufficient cause to reopen this case and identify a suspect.
In a December 19, 2021 Guam Daily News article by Nick Delgado, “GPD Enhancing Efforts to Solve 103 Cold Cases,” Guam police Chief Stephen Ignacio described new efforts to investigate and close these unsolved cases. He also revealed that he led the Guam Cold Case Task Force in the early 2000s, the time of Wannee’s death. The Guam police have posted a short video describing these cases. A box containing the case of the homicide of Wannee Laporn Bailey is visibly at the top — and it is in the top graphic on this post along with a photo of Wannee and Pornchai.
Wannee’s cremated remains were returned to Thailand after her death in 2000. Upon his own return to Thailand in 2021, Pornchai prayed at her tomb for the first time and slept in the half-built home she had hoped to complete for him. Pornchai is overwhelmed with the wreckage not only of his own life, but with the lives of Wannee and Priwan as well. Rebuilding is a daunting task, but Pornchai Moontri is today a man of unconquerable faith and an inspiration to many.
Richard Alan Bailey still resides at his lakeside Oregon home. After Wannee’s death in 2000, he traveled to Thailand and returned with a new Thai wife 31 years younger than himself.
+ + +
Please click here to view the Guam Court orders for restitution to Wannee and her estate for which Wannee died while Bailey ignored the Court orders.
Please share this important story and visit these related posts:
Below is a video of the youth pilgrimage in 2022 at the Domus Galilee. The NCW in the U.S.A. and Guam were present during the vocational meeting. About 200 young men stood up for the priesthood, 300 young women stood up for the monastery, and 200 families for the mission. You can easily identify a Guam youth among those in the crowd by the Hawaiian print shirt they wore as their uniform.
The pilgrimage to Israel took place in July. The Guam youth and their chaperones left Guam earlier than the adults. There were almost 300 people from Neocatechumenal Way in Israel. We met the youth from the United States. They were over 5000 people there. New Jersey brought 1,500 people to Israel. Both California and Texas had 1,100 with them, and Florida brought 800 people.
When the calling was made for the priesthood, 205 young men stood up and ran to the stage. About four Guam young men were among them. When the calling was made for those who felt a calling for women to join the Convent, 300 women ran to the stage. About four young women were from Guam. These young men and women will be nurtured into their vocations. It's always important to nurture the vocation of these youth who stood up for the calling. Without this nurture from the NCW communities, the temptations of the world can turn them away. When the calling came for the mission families, 200 families stood up. Biba to the Neocatechumenal Way! Bible for Way for promoting the priesthood. You can see the entire event in the following YouTube:
On May 28th, Cardinal Tobin ordained 5 new priests and 4 new deacons to the Archdiocese of Newark. Ashton Wong was one of the new priests ordained. Father Ashton was one of the seminarians in RMS Guam. Congratulations to Father Ashton! See the story here.
