Sexual Allegation Conspiracy

Roy Quintanilla came out on May 17, 2016, accusing Archbishop Apuron of sexually molesting him.  Shortly thereafter on May 31st, Doris Concepcion also came on the air claiming that her son Joseph Quinata told her on his deathbed that he was sexually molested by Archbishop Apuron.  The third person to appear was Walter Denton, who claimed that the Archbishop raped him. Recently, we had Roland Sondia making his appearance on June 15^th. 

  

In an interview with Travis Coffman dated May 17, 2016 (the same day Roy Quintanilla made his allegation), Tim Rohr explained that the call-in by Mae Ada in the Patti Arroyo talk show last year started it all. It prompted many alleged victims to call in, which then motivated him to spend countless hours and hard work searching for these alleged victims.  http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/pnc-k57-interviews/9357  “

Mae Ada, a member of the Laity Forward Movement, called in the Patti Arroyo talk show on August 19, 2015 and said that she met a gentleman at a funeral who claimed he was sexually molested by Archbishop Apuron.    http://pacificnewscenter.com/pnc-k57-interviews/item/5225-tim-rohr-with-patti-arroyo  Tim Rohr also wrote about Mae Ada’s call in his Junglewatch blog on the same day.  The post was about Mae’s phone call, but the TITLE of his post was “The Agat boy(s)”. http://www.junglewatch.info/2015/08/the-agat-boys.htm   (See the screen shot below.)

Now, note the DATE AND TIME of Tim’s comment under the OP (the bold is mine):    

1. Tim Rohr August 19, 2015 at 5:40 PM
To clarify, there is no accusation against Fr. Jack. The reference to his name appears to be related to the fact that the alleged victims may have confided in Fr. Jack at the time since he was Apuron's assistant when he was in Agat.

The following is a screen shot taken from Tim's Junglewatch blog:

On the SAME day as Mae Ada’s call-in, Tim wrote: "the FACT that alleged victims (plural) may have confided in Father Jack....".  Today, we know that two of the alleged victims, Roy Quintanilla and Walter Denton, both stated that they confided in Father Jack about the sexual abuse.  We also know that all the "alleged victims" came from Agat.  The evidence showed that Tim already had the "Agat boys" in position ready to do his bidding long before Mae Ada phoned the radio station.  On the radio with Patty Arroyo, Tim Rohr feigned a “surprise” and "shock" demeanor when Mae Ada called in, but the comment on his blog showed a planned conspiracy to deliberately remove the Archbishop.  

So, why did Tim make a false statement to Travis Coffman and go through such great lengths to stage this whole affair?  Perhaps because there were no victims who came forward.  Even after John Toves came on the scene claiming that his cousin (whom he had never spoken to) was sexually molested by Archbishop Apuron (an allegation he never heard his cousin say), his cousin never came forward.  No victim came forward, but Tim needed "victims" in order to remove the Archbishop.  Therefore, since no victims came forward, "alleged victims" were sought out.

Tim Rohr already had these "alleged victims" lined up long before Mae Ada called the radio station. All he needed was to convince people that there were "victims" out there who were molested by Archbishop Apuron.  Once people heard Mae Ada’s story on the radio, he has planted the seed in people's minds that these "alleged victims existed. 

John Toves and Walter Denton were next door neighbors in Agat. They grew up together and graduated from the same FDMS class.  Walter Denton was labeled Victim #1 by Tim Rohr despite that Roy Quintanilla made the first allegation.  On a radio talk show with Jesse Lujan, Denton said that he sent a letter to Archbishop Krebs on August, 2015. Tim Rohr, on the other hand, said that he only did a follow-up on Denton’s letter. http://www.junglewatch.info/search?q=Go+to+hell%2C+Diana  

However, in a recent interview with Jesse Lujan, Tim Rohr claimed that he did not know Roy Quintanilla or Walter Denton but was working with two other alleged victims who have not yet come forward.  He claimed that he did not seek out Quintanilla and Denton nor did they sought him out.  He also said that he did not aim for any sexual abuse stuff until it came out in the radio (which would be August 19, 2015). The interview of Tim Rohr with Jesse Lujan is in the following weblinks:

http://www.kuam.com/clip/12521218/the-buzz-tv-tim-rohr-1-of-2

http://www.kuam.com/clip/12521213/the-buzz-tv-tim-rohr-2-of-2

Contrary to Tim's statements, he aimed and focused on the sexual allegations because his goal was to remove Archbishop Apuron.  He was very much involved with Walter Denton’s letter to the Vatican just as he claimed in his interview with Patti Arroyo on June 10^th..   http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/pnc-k57-interviews/9682   In fact, he knew what was in Denton’s letter.  Was the letter really written by Walter Denton?  In his blog, Tim Rohr wrote the year “1977” and “40 years” as far back as October 2015.  See the screen shot below:

Then on January 22, 2016, he named a specific date: April 15, 1977.  See the screen shot below taken from his blog:

On February, 2016, he once again named "April 15, 1977."

On June 7^th, Walter Denton came out, accusing Archbishop Apuron of raping him.  He had a letter prepared.  His letter stated (the bold is mine): 

Fast forward to Friday April 15, 1977 on or about 5:30 pm. Father Anthony Apuron (ARCHBISHOP) was to give the Friday evening service. I was on the schedule to assist Father Anthony Apuron during Mass. After Mass, Father Tony asked me to stay at the Rectory on Saturday evening. I told Father Anthony  I had to ask my Dad.  My Dad told me I could. 

The full letter can be found in the Junglewatch blog:  http://www.junglewatch.info/2016/06/altar-boy-sodomized-by-father-apuron.html#more

Contrary to what Tim Rohr stated in the Jesse Lujan show, he was very much involved with both Quintanilla and Denton.  He had these "alleged victims" already lined up for almost a year, and they were simply waiting for Rohr to give them the signal to go public..  The day before Roland Sondia came out, Rohr told his readers in his blog to remember June 15^th at 10:00 a.m. That was the date and time Roland Sondia came out.  A similar thing was done with the rest of the alleged victims.  

In the Patti Arroyo talk show, Tim stated that Walter Denton was Victim #1 and Roy Quintanilla was Victim #3.  At that time, he also said that Victim #2 did not come out yet.  For someone who claimed that he had no involvement with Quintanilla and Denton in the Jesse Lujan talk show, he knew who was Victim #1, #2, and so on.  In the interview below, Tim Rohr admitted that he did not want Walter to go forward in public first, and that Roy was willing to go first. 

 http://www.pacificnewscenter.com/pnc-k57-interviews/9682   

So, why did Tim Rohr develop the sexual abuse ads with CCOG paying thousands of dollars for those ads, knowing that he already had these so-called "alleged victims" lined up just waiting for him to give the signal to appear in public?  Because he wanted people to think that it was the ads that brought them out otherwise it may look suspicious......just as it would look suspicious if people knew that Rohr already had the "Agat boys" lined up before Mae Ada came on the air. If people knew the truth, they would know they were not alleged victims at all, but accuse them of being false witnesses.  The goal was to remove Archbishop Apuron.  And all the "alleged victims" who came forward said to remove Archbshop Apuron.  That was the main restitution they requested.  

There were many inconsistencies in Tim's stories and interviews on the radio talk shows.  For example, on May 17th with Travis Coffman, Tim said that Roy Quintanilla got on a plane after May 13th, came to Guam and then publicly accused Apuron of sexually molesting him just 3 days later.  Then on May 19th with Phil Leon Guerrero, Tim said that he had Roy brought over to Guam from Hawaii a month ago.  A man who tells too many inconsistencies in his stories is a man who has something to hide.