Oh dear......oh my!!! I just found out from a reliable source that Tim Rohr is in charge of selling the Carmelite monastery in Tamuning. Now that the Carmelites have left, there is no need for the building. And it was Monsignor James Benavente who gave Tim that job.
well big deal Diana. someone has to sell the property. Tim is a real estate guy. I dont see a problem with this.why are you making a mountaon out of a mole hill? Are you jealous that you wanted to sell it? I think you are jealous.
Well, well, well, now that explains EVERYTHING. Now I know why Timmy is saying that Byrnes isn't aware of the FOIA from Attorney John Terlaje. Timmy doesn't want his followers to go against Byrnes cuz he gets to make some money. After he gets the money, then he will turn against Byrnes.
So, in "your" country, a person is innocent until proven guilty, and yet, by your tone and the accompanying picture, you judge Tim Rohr guilty... of what exactly is unclear, but guilty nonetheless.
You're a real piece of work, Diana. Keep up the evangelization. See how these Christians love one another. Oh, that's right, you've judged Tim and found him guilty of being not Christian too.
Selling property is not a crime. However, by YOUR defensive tone, you seem to think a crime has been committed.
Nevertheless, as Anonymous 12:36 pm pointed out, it explains why Tim is accusing Attorney John Terlaje of acting by himself without the permission of Archbishop Byrnes. Nevermind the fact that the document clearly stated that John Terlaje was acting in behalf of the Archbishop Byrnes. This means that the Archbishop had full knowledge of what he instructed his legal council to do.
Anon @ 3:07PM the last time I posted you thought I was Tim Rohr. LOL What little I know of Tim Rohr is that he's not like you and me because he's not afraid of posting comments using his name. Heck he posts on Junglewatch using his name. Diana isn't even Diana and still you'd rather believe someone who doesn't let anybody know who he/she is. SMH.
The jungle have accused me of being Jackie, Holly, Susan, Mae, Father Adrian, Father Pius, Father Edivaldo, and even the Archbishop. Does it really matter who I am when all the jungle does is ridicule people including those who use their real names? Dr. Eusebio was a member of the former Board of RMS, and still the jungle ridicules him as though they know the operations of RMS better than any board member.
J. Bautista, you are saying one helluva of a truth! Rohr takes all the money for himself. He will never donate any penny to the church. Just ask the pew people.
Rohr is calling people again to withhold donation from the parish churches! He plays God punishing Abp. Byrnes for scrutinizing the robber's bill. Rohr is happy that our churches will be looted by shark lawyers. What a shameless behavior from a greedy real estate agent!
So the problem with Tim in this transaction is that he's making money off the church....on a building that is not being used because the former users left.
Well I guess that isn't so far fetched to be suspicious if you consider that he's the one who pushed the Carmelites to leave by feeding them lies about the Archbishop and the NCW.
I guess you could also assume that what is happening with the monastary could happen to RMS....
Feed people enough lies to get them to do what you want, and then benefit off it by milking those same people of their assets.
I wonder if he will even donate his commission to the trust fund set up by Archbishop Hon to pay the alleged victims for the sexual abuses done to them.
Monsignor James is in charge finance in Archdiocese. Why wouldn't he put monastery on the market? They will need the money soon! Sell it Tim. James needs the dough. Hurry , hurry!
Sorry Diana, but I don't understand the point of the post.
1. There are no carmelites on Guam 2. The property is currently not being used by the Archdiocese 3. The Archdiocese could use the money of the sale to pay for outstanding or new debts
Why is it a problem to sell the old building when no one is using it?
And let's say it wasn't Tim, would you still have a problem with it? If so, why?
Did Mother Dawn give property to Monsignor James before she left? Why can't our Guam girls come back to Guam and pray among the Chamorros? I thought Father Pius indicated they will be coming to Guam to take place of Carmelites who abandoned us. That's what I heard.
Considering the controversy surrounding Tim and the fact that he stated that he is facing severe stress from the Archdiocese suing him sounds a bit fishy.
Yep. Timmy said that the Archdioceae was suing him and is causing him severe stress in his family and business. Sounds like he's gonna make a good commission selling something that belongs to the Archdiocese.
Oh well. Look at the bright side. If the Archdiocese is gonna sue Tim, they can get back the money he took as commission. Wouldn't that be ionic?
@Anon. 3:14 pm, you're so right! Where is Tim's integrity? He gets all riled up when he learns that the Archdiocese is suing him, but when the opportunity strikes to get money even from someone who is going to sue him, Tim takes that opportunity.
It's suspicious because the Archdiocese is suing him and he's now the person in charge of selling the property?
Well, if so, then he's faced with a dilemma.
1. Is he going to let his feelings about the Archdiocese get in the way of his handling of the transaction?
2. If they sue him, they could just sue him for what he made on the commission minus taxes and he would be back at his original financial position before the sale.
Well I don't actually see this as a dilemma at all.... It is a good thing he's in charge because he can prove to himself and his followers that what happens in his personal life stays there. Sounds a lot like what he's accusing Archbishop Apuron of NOT doing. But by his own actions he can prove it is POSSIBLE.
Or am I just naive to believe that could be possible...
Archbishop announced it belonged to him as corporation sole of Archdiocese. If we own it, why can't the Archdiocese make use of it? Diana, thank you for letting the people know about this. It is news! :-))
Must be a rumor you are spreading, Diana. Check your reliable source. Just doesn't ring true. Why would Monsignor get into it up to his eyeballs so soon after getting back in Hon's good graces? See what I mean?
Monsignor James in charge of Church assets. Tim Rohr a real estate agent. Monastery building up for grabs. MJ has the say on who sells it. TR is given the building to sell (supposedly.)
Am I the only one who was shocked to ready that Tim Rohr is claiming Mother Stella Maris is the one who got him to take care of the sale??? I thought she was dead! Is he REALLY losing it now?
I'm not surprised that Mother Dawn was connected to Tim. It's always been evident that whoever speaks out against the Way and Apuron has Tim connected behind them.
Anonymous @7:58--I'm not talking about Mother Dawn. He said *Mother Stella Maris* -- the one that Diana and Father Pius said knew of the arrangement but since she is no longer with us she can't verify. They said it was she and not Mother Dawn who arranged for the donation. Now Tim Rohr is claiming she was the one who asked him to take care of selling the property. What...she came to him in a dream? Or did she come back from the dead?
Tim Rohr never said who it was who asked to sell the monastery. He also never published the letter of the person who claimed she never heard of RMS or the NCW. Dr. Eusebio was the only one who mentioned Mother Stella and produced email correspondence from her. Tim claimed that the donor was deceived because she never heard of RMS and had the letter to prove it, but he never published that letter.....not even show whether that letter came from Mother Stella.
She spoke out against Father Pius, the head catechist of the NCW on Guam. She claimed that it was Father Pius who revealed who the donor was, which was false. Mother Dawn revealed who the donor was in 2014. It was published in the jungle blog.
Dear Diana at 10:25AM, But you don't deny that Mother Stella is still alive? If she is, then we can put put all this argument about the donation to rest and ask her to come out and say that her intention was indeed for the RMS and Tim Rohr is wrong! I don't understand why Fr. Pius, you, and Dr. Eusebio thought she was deceased....but if she is not, then shouldn't Fr. Pius or maybe AB Byrnes just go to her?
The email that had the prewritten testimony saying from the donor confirming that the $2m gift was for the sole purpose of establishing an RMS seminary in Guam. Instead the email contained the letter from the donor informing Apuron that it would be a lie should she sign the prewritten letter.
You misunderstood what I said. We have the correspondence between Archbishop and Apuron and MOTHER STELLA saying that she will donate 2 million dollars for the seminary.
Tim Rohr claimed that he had an email from the donor saying she never heard of the RMS Seminary. However, Tim never published that email in his blog. When Dr. Eusebio brought out the FACT that the Archbishop was dealing with someone named Mother Stella, Tim never said whether that was the same name on the email in which was stated that she has never heard about RMS. Instead, Tim focused on the email Eusebio brought out and focused that the name RMS was not mentioned.
Therefore, the email that Tim has was NOT from Mother Stella, but from someone else who never even wrote or spoke to Archbishop Apuron.
Freemasonry is made of amazingly colorful people. One day they "protect" your faith, the next day they lecture your bishop about ethical behavior. Then they produce rogue legislation to advance their destructive causes and play their stupid game of filing lawsuits with wild accusations and suing the "pants off" of everybody who questions them. Another day they just show their sheer greed and money hunger in their true color as they are. Because Freemasonry is not only an atheistic-liberal political agency, it is also a business enterprise. The richest people on earth are all Freemasons without exception!
It is no wonder Rohr wanted to keep the information of his astronomical profit making on selling church property. First of all, he wanted to keep the information away from his own pawns in his diabolic chess game against the Catholic Church. Some of his thugs may open their eyes and ask him: "Timmy?! That's you?!" and they would just look out of their head puzzled silly. Rohr wants to prevent this. He does not want to look like, as he is, a monster. It is much better to grow your fat in the dark, rather than showing your eating habit of a swine in daylight.
Masons are surely changing their tactic now. The new Archbishop is showing real authority against them, demonstrating who is in power in the house! This is Archbishop Byrnes and not Rohr's brigands! The only language mason conspirators understand is the language of power and domination. Show them real power and they will curl up in fear and trembling. Archbishop Byrnes will teach them to behave as human beings, stop picketing and stop robbing the parishes. So they will go underground, hide and grab as much assets from the church as they can reach. They'll pay off themselves in the secrecy of dark and shady dealings on your expense, while trying to deceive the power that be of the opposite. Never forget their father is the one who has been a liar from the beginning!
Be ready to recognize lousy varmints hiding in the dark corners of your church watching for booty and spoil to grab. These are the masons in your church, the people of Rohr, trying to get filthy rich on your expense! Archbishop Byrnes, for the sake of Christ please, clean up our parishes from them!
It is frightening that CCOG already turns against Archbishop Byrnes because of striking down Bill 326-33 (Public Law 33-187). Archbishop Byrnes just started as bishop and these people already want to get rid of him. The spirit of division is already turning high. People who want to control him are dictating him what to do. It is a shame.
Rohr is yelling in JW that Byrnes can thank him he was appointed Archbishop! "Why are you here in the first place?" - brags. How can you say such mean thing to an Archbishop in office?! Byrnes was not appointed because of Rohr or CCOG. On the contrary, he was appointed against them! Rohr is claiming credit for "chasing" Archbishops Apuron and Hon away. Ridiculous! He claims credit for "saving the Yona property". He claims credit for Bill 326, as well.
This bill will be the fall of the anti-Catholic movement on Guam. This bill is a major scam that will be recorded in the history of the Catholic Church. How can the faithful forget what is done against them? One day Frank Aguon will regret he pushed forward this scam legislation and Governor Calvo will regret he signed it into law! They will blame Rohr, whose name they can bless together with Lucifer, when the righteous backlash of the faithful whom they humiliated will make judgment.
The mortal sin of Rohr is that he used the pedophilia card against those whom he did not like. Yes! This kind of sin has no statute of imitation because he did not have to create a scandal!
Similarly ambitious men and women will use the same card anytime freely in the future if they want to take out someone. It is very bad! I wonder how would Rohr feel if his own medicine would go sour.
It would be best for everyone if Bill 326 is struck down by the Supreme Court because it is inorganic and unconstitutional! There is no other way out. Perhaps, CCOG and Rohr could be the first to petition for that.
A well-known tactic of Freemasonry is the creation of boogeymans. CCOG claims they criticize Archbishop Apuron because of his actions. Wrong! Rohr says everything is done against the church because of Apuron. False! It is the other way around! They picked Apuron'n name to make him a boogeyman to attack. But they don't care about him, they just use his name as a pretext for covert operation against the Catholic Church!
You see this tactic in the abuse bill. Rohr asserted he had to create the bill to eliminate Archbishop Apuron from power. He takes the credit for this. But the truth is the opposite! They only use the name of the Archbishop to penetrate church leadership and the legislature. Once they are inside, they start to dismantle everything. The bill they forced on the Guam Senate through their surrogates in the legislature has nothing to do with Apuron anymore. It is an unveiled assault on the Catholic Church itself! We came to full circle, back to the original plan of Freemasonry to burn up the Catholic faith! They don't even know who their boogeyman was, because they only needed his name to penetrate the circles of power.
In their obstinate determination to obstruct and destroy, CCOG and allied forces tried to make Archbishop Hon another boogeyman. Never mind Hon accommodated all their wishes. He earned their contempt by trying to protect the church's assets from the impending free looting by a masonic abuse law. All the whimpering about Apuron that Rohr regurgitates over and over is irrelevant now. The only thing that matters is the protection of the church from further destruction! This was the message of Hon CCOG people could not bear! Their masonic goal is an ongoing, all encompassing destruction that won't ever stop!
You see the masonic fury turning against Archbishop Byrnes now. Rohr and his brigands stick to the law that gives them free unlimited access to the assets of the church. They are already counting their predicted profit by the millions of dollars, while dividing an unearned booty among themselves. Archbishop Byrnes has to stop them! The masonic bill has to be struck down and the church property has to be secured! It does not matter at all what Archbishops Apuron or Hon did or did not do in the past. The only thing that counts is that our Archbishop has the power and authority to put a lid on further masonic trouble making and limit the damages to the church these unscrupulous conspirators inflict on the faithful.
I do not think they are Free Masons despite that I know that the Junglewatch Nation wants to control the Catholic Church. They do that by trying to control the Archbishop. If the Archbishop does something they do not like, they will find ways to get rid of him without going through the proper channels. In my opinion, they are misguided Catholics.
In fact, when Archbishop Hon scolded Father Mike for disobedience, Tim Rohr accused Hon of trying to set up someone to accuse Father Mike of sexually molesting him. He even aired that on the Patti Arroyo talk show. However, that person never appeared with his accusation against Father Mike.
Diana, of course, they are not all masons. They are only controlled by a very smart and shrewd masonic agenda. It is a commonplace that so called "arch-conservatives" are very easy to infect by subversive thoughts because of their lack of intellectual strength education. The reason they stick to arch-conservative views is that it is very easy to learn, you only need to follow word-by-word instruction. Then any trained Freemason captain can deceive them, because they are conditioned to follow others, throw them some conservative bones to chew on and the same time switch their minds into subversive mode. This is exactly what you see when Rohr is waiving the red flag to lead the CCOG flock on assault against the Catholic Church.
St. Maximilan Kolbe wrote: “These men without God find themselves in a tragic situation. Such implacable hatred for the Church and the ambassadors of Christ on Earth is not in the power of individual persons, but of a systematic activity stemming in the final analysis from Freemasonry. In particular, it aims to destroy the Catholic religion. Their decrees have been spread throughout the world, in different disguises. But with the same goal: we will conquer the Catholic Church."
https://www.ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/KOLANTI.HTM
Pope Leo XIII in 1884 analyzed continental Grand Orient type philosophical "principles and practices". He identified "the subversive, revolutionary activity characteristic of the Grand Orient lodges of the continent". Leo XIII "emphasizes that 'the ultimate and principle aim' of Masonry 'was to destroy to its very foundations any civil or religious order established throughout Christendom."
Dear voice, there are no 7 million visitors at JW! The same people make hundreds and hundreds of clicks every day. Another fake side of Rohr! Lol. If they are masons or not, I don't know.
Wow, this is scary stuff! St. Maximilian knew the Masons very much because he devoted his life to protect the church from them and from other enemies of destruction. He says the Masons have a system, they do not act just on impulse. They follow a very thoroughly elaborated destructive plan. They prey on naive and innocent people who do not know them and easily fall for their scheming. Truly dangerous kind of activity! We have to pray to the Lord every day to protect us from their vices.
Diana just to remember the pilgrimage and where we went and that one place we went too and what that blessed person did in Poland and what were going through now and how he risked his life for god
well big deal Diana. someone has to sell the property. Tim is a real estate guy. I dont see a problem with this.why are you making a mountaon out of a mole hill? Are you jealous that you wanted to sell it? I think you are jealous.
ReplyDeleteNo, my friend, it is called insidious deal making, a felony, because of his conflict of interest in the matter!
DeleteWhy is it a conflict of interest? He's a realtor doing his job. Duh. Monsignor knows he is in real estate. Among other things. Hee hee
DeleteA clear case of bribery.
DeleteWell, well, well, now that explains EVERYTHING. Now I know why Timmy is saying that Byrnes isn't aware of the FOIA from Attorney John Terlaje. Timmy doesn't want his followers to go against Byrnes cuz he gets to make some money. After he gets the money, then he will turn against Byrnes.
ReplyDeleteRohr wants to grow more fat on his body out of church money.
DeleteGimme, gimme, gimme, gimme more, oh baby,
gimme, gimme, gimme, gimme more!
OMG, what a fake!
Explains everything? Doubt it very much. 12:36
DeleteSo, in "your" country, a person is innocent until proven guilty, and yet, by your tone and the accompanying picture, you judge Tim Rohr guilty... of what exactly is unclear, but guilty nonetheless.
ReplyDeleteYou're a real piece of work, Diana. Keep up the evangelization. See how these Christians love one another. Oh, that's right, you've judged Tim and found him guilty of being not Christian too.
Dear Anonymous at 1:22 pm,
DeleteSelling property is not a crime. However, by YOUR defensive tone, you seem to think a crime has been committed.
Nevertheless, as Anonymous 12:36 pm pointed out, it explains why Tim is accusing Attorney John Terlaje of acting by himself without the permission of Archbishop Byrnes. Nevermind the fact that the document clearly stated that John Terlaje was acting in behalf of the Archbishop Byrnes. This means that the Archbishop had full knowledge of what he instructed his legal council to do.
is that you Tim again 1:22PM ??
DeleteTim Rohr is innocent until proved guilty. So we'll prove that he IS guilty. After then, he will be a convicted felon. Period!
Deleteso what else is new? what will be the commission fees for the monastery? what will be the commission fees for the seminary?
Deletefollow the money and you will find the motivation.
greed. If you disagree; ask tim to donate his commission to the church.
yeah right!
Anon @ 3:07PM the last time I posted you thought I was Tim Rohr. LOL
DeleteWhat little I know of Tim Rohr is that he's not like you and me because he's not afraid of posting comments using his name.
Heck he posts on Junglewatch using his name.
Diana isn't even Diana and still you'd rather believe someone who doesn't let anybody know who he/she is. SMH.
Dear Anonymous at 4:59 pm,
DeleteThe jungle have accused me of being Jackie, Holly, Susan, Mae, Father Adrian, Father Pius, Father Edivaldo, and even the Archbishop. Does it really matter who I am when all the jungle does is ridicule people including those who use their real names? Dr. Eusebio was a member of the former Board of RMS, and still the jungle ridicules him as though they know the operations of RMS better than any board member.
OK TIM!!
DeleteJ. Bautista, you are saying one helluva of a truth! Rohr takes all the money for himself. He will never donate any penny to the church. Just ask the pew people.
DeleteRohr is calling people again to withhold donation from the parish churches! He plays God punishing Abp. Byrnes for scrutinizing the robber's bill. Rohr is happy that our churches will be looted by shark lawyers. What a shameless behavior from a greedy real estate agent!
So the problem with Tim in this transaction is that he's making money off the church....on a building that is not being used because the former users left.
DeleteWell I guess that isn't so far fetched to be suspicious if you consider that he's the one who pushed the Carmelites to leave by feeding them lies about the Archbishop and the NCW.
I guess you could also assume that what is happening with the monastary could happen to RMS....
Feed people enough lies to get them to do what you want, and then benefit off it by milking those same people of their assets.
Dear J. Baustista,
DeleteI wonder if he will even donate his commission to the trust fund set up by Archbishop Hon to pay the alleged victims for the sexual abuses done to them.
@ Anon. 6:24 pm. Wasn't that the goal? Discredit the integrity of RMS so they can have it shut down. And then sell it.
DeleteSincerely it is not the rohrs of the our little world that is the issue today.
DeleteWe are also the rohrs of the world.
We also have struggles with giving freely...from the heart...without hesitation...with this thing called love.
to say otherwise would be hypocritical as we are not in heaven yet.
Monsignor James is in charge finance in Archdiocese. Why wouldn't he put monastery on the market? They will need the money soon! Sell it Tim. James needs the dough. Hurry , hurry!
ReplyDeleteSorry Diana, but I don't understand the point of the post.
ReplyDelete1. There are no carmelites on Guam
2. The property is currently not being used by the Archdiocese
3. The Archdiocese could use the money of the sale to pay for outstanding or new debts
Why is it a problem to sell the old building when no one is using it?
And let's say it wasn't Tim, would you still have a problem with it? If so, why?
What are you trying to imply here?
ReplyDeleteFunny dealing!
DeleteDid Mother Dawn give property to Monsignor James before she left? Why can't our Guam girls come back to Guam and pray among the Chamorros? I thought Father Pius indicated they will be coming to Guam to take place of Carmelites who abandoned us. That's what I heard.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 2:19 pm,
DeleteConsidering the controversy surrounding Tim and the fact that he stated that he is facing severe stress from the Archdiocese suing him sounds a bit fishy.
Yep. Timmy said that the Archdioceae was suing him and is causing him severe stress in his family and business. Sounds like he's gonna make a good commission selling something that belongs to the Archdiocese.
DeleteOh well. Look at the bright side. If the Archdiocese is gonna sue Tim, they can get back the money he took as commission. Wouldn't that be ionic?
The families of Guam girls who went to far away NJ will be thrilled to have them back here. Why did they have to go so far away? Does anyone know?
DeleteOops! Sorry Anonymous 2:19 pm, my comment was addressed to Anonymous 1:43 pm.
Delete@Anon. 3:14 pm, you're so right! Where is Tim's integrity? He gets all riled up when he learns that the Archdiocese is suing him, but when the opportunity strikes to get money even from someone who is going to sue him, Tim takes that opportunity.
DeleteThe guy is a riot!
DeleteDiana 2:48pm:
DeleteIt's suspicious because the Archdiocese is suing him and he's now the person in charge of selling the property?
Well, if so, then he's faced with a dilemma.
1. Is he going to let his feelings about the Archdiocese get in the way of his handling of the transaction?
2. If they sue him, they could just sue him for what he made on the commission minus taxes and he would be back at his original financial position before the sale.
Well I don't actually see this as a dilemma at all.... It is a good thing he's in charge because he can prove to himself and his followers that what happens in his personal life stays there. Sounds a lot like what he's accusing Archbishop Apuron of NOT doing. But by his own actions he can prove it is POSSIBLE.
Or am I just naive to believe that could be possible...
Maria Hon Santos let Carmelite's use her house when Archbishop Anthony asked her to. The monastery belongs to her. Period. End of discussion.
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 3:11 pm,
DeleteAccording to the Archdiocesan website, they are claiming that it as belonging to the Archdiocese. In 2006' the house was renovated into a monastery.
Archbishop announced it belonged to him as corporation sole of Archdiocese. If we own it, why can't the Archdiocese make use of it? Diana, thank you for letting the people know about this. It is news! :-))
DeleteWasn't Father Pius the one who supervised the renovation? Angela told our community that.
Delete
ReplyDeletealot of folks want to purchase Carmel Monastery. Best to auction property beginning at $3,000,000.
Must be a rumor you are spreading, Diana. Check your reliable source. Just doesn't ring true. Why would Monsignor get into it up to his eyeballs so soon after getting back in Hon's good graces? See what I mean?
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 3:52 pm,
DeleteTim Rohr already admitted it in his blog, so it is NOT a rumor. 😆
ReplyDeleteagree best auction property.
Who is the lady Tim is claiming is you, Diana?
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 4:20 pm,
DeleteI have no idea. I think her name is Mae or May.
Tim Acts Childish.
DeleteDiana, Tim pointing out your errors in breaking news. He makes sense. Public records.
DeleteDear Anonymous at 4:50 pm,
DeleteI never got it from public records. I received it from a reliable source, and the source turned out to be reliable.
Monsignor James in charge of Church assets. Tim Rohr a real estate agent. Monastery building up for grabs. MJ has the say on who sells it. TR is given the building to sell (supposedly.)
ReplyDeleteBoy do i see a cash opportunity for Tim here.
Am I the only one who was shocked to ready that Tim Rohr is claiming Mother Stella Maris is the one who got him to take care of the sale??? I thought she was dead! Is he REALLY losing it now?
ReplyDeleteI'm not surprised that Mother Dawn was connected to Tim. It's always been evident that whoever speaks out against the Way and Apuron has Tim connected behind them.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous @7:58--I'm not talking about Mother Dawn. He said *Mother Stella Maris* -- the one that Diana and Father Pius said knew of the arrangement but since she is no longer with us she can't verify. They said it was she and not Mother Dawn who arranged for the donation.
DeleteNow Tim Rohr is claiming she was the one who asked him to take care of selling the property.
What...she came to him in a dream? Or did she come back from the dead?
Diana, be fair and balanced. When did Mother Dawn speak against NCW? Be specific.
DeleteDear Anonymous at 8:58 am,
DeleteTim Rohr never said who it was who asked to sell the monastery. He also never published the letter of the person who claimed she never heard of RMS or the NCW. Dr. Eusebio was the only one who mentioned Mother Stella and produced email correspondence from her. Tim claimed that the donor was deceived because she never heard of RMS and had the letter to prove it, but he never published that letter.....not even show whether that letter came from Mother Stella.
Dear Anonymous at 9:13 am,
DeleteShe spoke out against Father Pius, the head catechist of the NCW on Guam. She claimed that it was Father Pius who revealed who the donor was, which was false. Mother Dawn revealed who the donor was in 2014. It was published in the jungle blog.
Dear Diana at 10:25AM,
DeleteBut you don't deny that Mother Stella is still alive? If she is, then we can put put all this argument about the donation to rest and ask her to come out and say that her intention was indeed for the RMS and Tim Rohr is wrong!
I don't understand why Fr. Pius, you, and Dr. Eusebio thought she was deceased....but if she is not, then shouldn't Fr. Pius or maybe AB Byrnes just go to her?
Dear Anonymous at 3:06 pm,
DeleteThen ask her. Whatever email that Mother Dawn gave to Tim is NOT Mother Stella.
Diana, what are you talking about. Makes no sense whatsoever. What email?
DeleteThe email that had the prewritten testimony saying from the donor confirming that the $2m gift was for the sole purpose of establishing an RMS seminary in Guam. Instead the email contained the letter from the donor informing Apuron that it would be a lie should she sign the prewritten letter.
DeleteDear Anonymous at 1:53 pm,
DeleteYou misunderstood what I said. We have the correspondence between Archbishop and Apuron and MOTHER STELLA saying that she will donate 2 million dollars for the seminary.
Tim Rohr claimed that he had an email from the donor saying she never heard of the RMS Seminary. However, Tim never published that email in his blog. When Dr. Eusebio brought out the FACT that the Archbishop was dealing with someone named Mother Stella, Tim never said whether that was the same name on the email in which was stated that she has never heard about RMS. Instead, Tim focused on the email Eusebio brought out and focused that the name RMS was not mentioned.
Therefore, the email that Tim has was NOT from Mother Stella, but from someone else who never even wrote or spoke to Archbishop Apuron.
Freemasonry is made of amazingly colorful people. One day they "protect" your faith, the next day they lecture your bishop about ethical behavior. Then they produce rogue legislation to advance their destructive causes and play their stupid game of filing lawsuits with wild accusations and suing the "pants off" of everybody who questions them. Another day they just show their sheer greed and money hunger in their true color as they are. Because Freemasonry is not only an atheistic-liberal political agency, it is also a business enterprise. The richest people on earth are all Freemasons without exception!
ReplyDeleteIt is no wonder Rohr wanted to keep the information of his astronomical profit making on selling church property. First of all, he wanted to keep the information away from his own pawns in his diabolic chess game against the Catholic Church. Some of his thugs may open their eyes and ask him: "Timmy?! That's you?!" and they would just look out of their head puzzled silly. Rohr wants to prevent this. He does not want to look like, as he is, a monster. It is much better to grow your fat in the dark, rather than showing your eating habit of a swine in daylight.
Masons are surely changing their tactic now. The new Archbishop is showing real authority against them, demonstrating who is in power in the house! This is Archbishop Byrnes and not Rohr's brigands! The only language mason conspirators understand is the language of power and domination. Show them real power and they will curl up in fear and trembling. Archbishop Byrnes will teach them to behave as human beings, stop picketing and stop robbing the parishes. So they will go underground, hide and grab as much assets from the church as they can reach. They'll pay off themselves in the secrecy of dark and shady dealings on your expense, while trying to deceive the power that be of the opposite. Never forget their father is the one who has been a liar from the beginning!
Be ready to recognize lousy varmints hiding in the dark corners of your church watching for booty and spoil to grab. These are the masons in your church, the people of Rohr, trying to get filthy rich on your expense! Archbishop Byrnes, for the sake of Christ please, clean up our parishes from them!
It is frightening that CCOG already turns against Archbishop Byrnes because of striking down Bill 326-33 (Public Law 33-187). Archbishop Byrnes just started as bishop and these people already want to get rid of him. The spirit of division is already turning high. People who want to control him are dictating him what to do. It is a shame.
DeleteRohr is yelling in JW that Byrnes can thank him he was appointed Archbishop! "Why are you here in the first place?" - brags. How can you say such mean thing to an Archbishop in office?! Byrnes was not appointed because of Rohr or CCOG. On the contrary, he was appointed against them! Rohr is claiming credit for "chasing" Archbishops Apuron and Hon away. Ridiculous! He claims credit for "saving the Yona property". He claims credit for Bill 326, as well.
This bill will be the fall of the anti-Catholic movement on Guam. This bill is a major scam that will be recorded in the history of the Catholic Church. How can the faithful forget what is done against them? One day Frank Aguon will regret he pushed forward this scam legislation and Governor Calvo will regret he signed it into law! They will blame Rohr, whose name they can bless together with Lucifer, when the righteous backlash of the faithful whom they humiliated will make judgment.
The mortal sin of Rohr is that he used the pedophilia card against those whom he did not like. Yes! This kind of sin has no statute of imitation because he did not have to create a scandal!
DeleteSimilarly ambitious men and women will use the same card anytime freely in the future if they want to take out someone. It is very bad! I wonder how would Rohr feel if his own medicine would go sour.
It would be best for everyone if Bill 326 is struck down by the Supreme Court because it is inorganic and unconstitutional! There is no other way out. Perhaps, CCOG and Rohr could be the first to petition for that.
A well-known tactic of Freemasonry is the creation of boogeymans. CCOG claims they criticize Archbishop Apuron because of his actions. Wrong! Rohr says everything is done against the church because of Apuron. False! It is the other way around! They picked Apuron'n name to make him a boogeyman to attack. But they don't care about him, they just use his name as a pretext for covert operation against the Catholic Church!
ReplyDeleteYou see this tactic in the abuse bill. Rohr asserted he had to create the bill to eliminate Archbishop Apuron from power. He takes the credit for this. But the truth is the opposite! They only use the name of the Archbishop to penetrate church leadership and the legislature. Once they are inside, they start to dismantle everything. The bill they forced on the Guam Senate through their surrogates in the legislature has nothing to do with Apuron anymore. It is an unveiled assault on the Catholic Church itself! We came to full circle, back to the original plan of Freemasonry to burn up the Catholic faith! They don't even know who their boogeyman was, because they only needed his name to penetrate the circles of power.
In their obstinate determination to obstruct and destroy, CCOG and allied forces tried to make Archbishop Hon another boogeyman. Never mind Hon accommodated all their wishes. He earned their contempt by trying to protect the church's assets from the impending free looting by a masonic abuse law. All the whimpering about Apuron that Rohr regurgitates over and over is irrelevant now. The only thing that matters is the protection of the church from further destruction! This was the message of Hon CCOG people could not bear! Their masonic goal is an ongoing, all encompassing destruction that won't ever stop!
You see the masonic fury turning against Archbishop Byrnes now. Rohr and his brigands stick to the law that gives them free unlimited access to the assets of the church. They are already counting their predicted profit by the millions of dollars, while dividing an unearned booty among themselves. Archbishop Byrnes has to stop them! The masonic bill has to be struck down and the church property has to be secured! It does not matter at all what Archbishops Apuron or Hon did or did not do in the past. The only thing that counts is that our Archbishop has the power and authority to put a lid on further masonic trouble making and limit the damages to the church these unscrupulous conspirators inflict on the faithful.
Dear voice of truth,
DeleteI do not think they are Free Masons despite that I know that the Junglewatch Nation wants to control the Catholic Church. They do that by trying to control the Archbishop. If the Archbishop does something they do not like, they will find ways to get rid of him without going through the proper channels. In my opinion, they are misguided Catholics.
In fact, when Archbishop Hon scolded Father Mike for disobedience, Tim Rohr accused Hon of trying to set up someone to accuse Father Mike of sexually molesting him. He even aired that on the Patti Arroyo talk show. However, that person never appeared with his accusation against Father Mike.
Diana, of course, they are not all masons. They are only controlled by a very smart and shrewd masonic agenda. It is a commonplace that so called "arch-conservatives" are very easy to infect by subversive thoughts because of their lack of intellectual strength education. The reason they stick to arch-conservative views is that it is very easy to learn, you only need to follow word-by-word instruction. Then any trained Freemason captain can deceive them, because they are conditioned to follow others, throw them some conservative bones to chew on and the same time switch their minds into subversive mode. This is exactly what you see when Rohr is waiving the red flag to lead the CCOG flock on assault against the Catholic Church.
DeleteSt. Maximilan Kolbe wrote: “These men without God find themselves in a tragic situation. Such implacable hatred for the Church and the ambassadors of Christ on Earth is not in the power of individual persons, but of a systematic activity stemming in the final analysis from Freemasonry. In particular, it aims to destroy the Catholic religion. Their decrees have been spread throughout the world, in different disguises. But with the same goal: we will conquer the Catholic Church."
https://www.ewtn.com/library/ANSWERS/KOLANTI.HTM
Pope Leo XIII in 1884 analyzed continental Grand Orient type philosophical "principles and practices". He identified "the subversive, revolutionary activity characteristic of the Grand Orient lodges of the continent". Leo XIII "emphasizes that 'the ultimate and principle aim' of Masonry 'was to destroy to its very foundations any civil or religious order established throughout Christendom."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_ban_of_Freemasonry
Dear Diana, please, also keep in mind the 7 million masonic visitors JW is bragging about. It is their network made visible around the globe!
DeleteDear voice, there are no 7 million visitors at JW! The same people make hundreds and hundreds of clicks every day. Another fake side of Rohr! Lol. If they are masons or not, I don't know.
Delete"Systematic activity stemming from Freemasonry."
DeleteWow, this is scary stuff! St. Maximilian knew the Masons very much because he devoted his life to protect the church from them and from other enemies of destruction. He says the Masons have a system, they do not act just on impulse. They follow a very thoroughly elaborated destructive plan. They prey on naive and innocent people who do not know them and easily fall for their scheming. Truly dangerous kind of activity! We have to pray to the Lord every day to protect us from their vices.
Diana just to remember the pilgrimage and where we went and that one place we went too and what that blessed person did in Poland and what were going through now and how he risked his life for god
ReplyDeleteBiba biba biba blessed jerzy
Of Poland