Blog Song
▼
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
In The Service Of The Family: A Prophetic Mission
In the Service of the Family: the Prophetic Mission of the Lay Faithful
President of Laity Council Offers Pre-Synod Exhortation
October 03, 2014 - The president of the Pontifical Council of the Laity, Cardinal Stanisław Ryłko, has issued a statement ahead of the Extraordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops on the Family.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The fact that the family is undergoing a very serious crisis at this time is there for us all to see. Particularly in Western culture, marriage is increasingly becoming a “residual choice”. Many are choosing not to get married, and there is a huge increase in the number of cohabiting couples and of people getting divorced. The gap is widening between the Church magisterium and the actual lives of the faithful. We are undoubtedly facing a dangerous post-modern cultural shift that threatens the fate of humankind. It is not by chance that Saint John Paul II wrote in Familiaris Consortio: “The future of humanity passes by way of the family”.1 The Church wishes to address this major challenge in the 3rd Extraordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, and to give a proper pastoral response to the question: how can we proclaim the Gospel of the family in our world that promotes and imposes patterns of life that radically contradict its fundamental principles?
I will touch briefly on the decisive and irreplaceable role of the Catholic laity, men and women, in proclaiming the Gospel of the family. Today more than ever, we need witnesses who live out the Gospel of the family to the fullest and with joy, and who show the world that it is a beautiful and fascinating way of life, a source of happiness for spouses and children. Here there is enormous scope for the prophetic mission of our laity. In the lives of Christian couples today it takes the courage of prophets, the courage to stand up to the dominant culture. Someone has rightly said, “Whether it wants to or not, the Church in the West is on its way to becoming a counterculture, and its future now depends chiefly on whether it is able, as the salt of the earth, to keep its savor and not be trampled underfoot by men”.2
In our times it often happens that when the Church speaks out about the nature of family and marriage (union between a man and a woman) and its indissolubility, faithful and fruitful conjugal love and openness to life, it may seem like a voice “crying in the wilderness” that is often contested, rejected and even ridiculed by the media. However this voice cannot and must not fail to be heard because, as the Second Vatican Council says: “The well-being of the individual person and of human and Christian society is intimately linked with the healthy condition of that community produced by marriage and family”.3 It is in fact a case of defending the very nature of the human being created by God as male and female.
Pope Benedict XVI said: “We live at a time of uncertainty about what it means to be human … In the face of this, we as Christians must defend the inviolable dignity of human beings … Faith in God must take concrete form in a common defence of humanity”.4 A service of vital importance that the Church must offer humanity is the proclamation of and witness to the Gospel of the family. This is a central work of mercy. It is a task for the lay faithful in particular in the society in which they live to be the Gospel leaven that transforms the world from within, the salt of the earth, the light of the world.5 We remember the words of the letter to Diognetus: “Christians … live in the flesh, but they are not governed by the desires of the flesh. They pass their days upon earth, but they are citizens of heaven…. To speak in general terms, we may say that the Christian is to the world what the soul is to the body. …Such is the Christian’s lofty and divinely appointed function, from which they are not
permitted to excuse themselves”. 6
At this point, in the context of the Synod of Bishops on the family, there are some basic questions that Catholic spouses above all must ask: do I really live my marriage and family life according to God's plan? Have I the courage to trust fully the Gospel of the family proclaimed by the magisterium of the Church? In spite of my limitations and my weakness, do I try to give witness to the beauty of marriage and the Christian family environment in which I live? The pressure of post-modernity in this field is extremely strong and many give in to its destructive dictates. Unfortunately, even among the ranks of the baptised, attitudes of rejection (explicit or implicit) are now spreading like wildfire, as well as choices that stand in stark contrast to the Church's magisterium. This brings much suffering to married couples and especially to children because of failed marriages.
In this dramatic situation, the Church looks with confidence to the younger generations. In Rio de Janeiro, Pope Francis, in dialogue with young people, spoke to them of this and said, “Today, there are those who say that marriage is out of fashion. Is it out of fashion? In a culture of relativism and the ephemeral, many preach the importance of ‘enjoying’ the moment. They say that it is not worth making a life-long commitment, making a definitive decision, ‘for ever’, because we do not know what tomorrow will bring. I ask you, instead, to be revolutionaries, I ask you to swim against the tide; yes, I am asking you to rebel against this culture that sees everything as temporary and that ultimately believes you are incapable of responsibility, that believes you are incapable of true love. I have confidence in you and I pray for you”.7
Christian families need to be helped and supported by the Church. The family needs a strong message of hope. The primary source is to be found in the young with their ability to challenge the surrounding circumstances and to go against the current, just as Pope Francis said. It is true – as we are told by the Instrumentum Laboris – that at the level of our local churches there are many specialised pastoral facilities and lay associations that work to help families, but this is not enough. There is a great need to give in depth thought to the process of preparation of young people for marriage and to rethink family ministry so that it can truly express the maternal face of the Church, a welcoming face that does not exclude anyone. The Church today is called to accompany Christian couples pastorally and with generosity, charity and empathy, especially those who are in crisis or are living in irregular situations (divorced and remarried divorcees). With renewed courage and competence, the Church must deal with those new and often unfamiliar problems of marriage and the family (think for example of issues related to bioethics ...). The Church, pastors and laity, must therefore undertake a journey of true “pastoral and missionary conversion that cannot leave things as they presently are”. 8
The Gospel of the family presents Christian couples with high demanding targets that definitely go against the current with respect to the dominant culture. This is often presented in a watered-down and softened way in our pastoral ministry. There is even censoring of those aspects that are particularly demanding (for example, the teaching of Pope Paul VI’s Humanae Vitae), in order to make it more palatable to public opinion. In this way, however, we forget that its beauty and its power of attraction are precisely in that “newness” that surprises us and challenges us with radical proposals. The way offered to
Christians by Christ is “narrow” and “the door is narrow”,9 but the grace of God comes to our aid.
Christ opens a fascinating horizon of holiness to Christian spouses. He shows them that marriage and family can be a privileged way to holiness. Perhaps in our pastoral care of marriage and the family, we – both pastors and lay people – have little trust in the primacy of grace in the Christian life! Often, when we think about the “feasibility” of gospel principles, we refer exclusively to worldly standards and discard certain requirements that are difficult and sensitive.
In this regard, we may recall a beautiful dialogue between Cardinal Frederick and Don Abbondio in “The Betrothed” by Alessandro Manzoni: “It is but too true, said Frederick. Such is our terrible and miserable condition! We exact rigorously from others, that which it may be we would not be willing to render ourselves; we judge, correct, and reprimand, and God alone knows what we would do in the same situation, what we have done in similar situations. But, woe be to me, if I take my weakness for the measure of another's duty, for the rule of my instruction!” Immediately after this Cardinal Frederick adds one important
thing: “Nevertheless it is certain, that while imparting precepts, I should also afford an example to my neighbour, and not resemble the pharisee, who imposes on others enormous burdens, which he himself would not so much as touch with his finger”.10 This is a good
lesson that is worth pondering ...
In the debate on the state of marriage and the family, a gloomy and rather dramatic tone is currently prevailing. We are witnessing a dangerous proliferation of “false prophets” who want to convince us that the changes brought about by post-modernity are the last word on the story, and therefore irreversible, and that we Christians should obey their arrogant dictates when proclaiming the Gospel of the family. However, at this juncture, we must not forget that the Lord of history is Christ Himself, and He faithfully goes before us.
Strengthened by this assurance, Pope Francis wants to launch a new season of evangelisation in the Church, marked by a joy that comes not from human calculations, but from theological hope. Among the signs of hope that must be mentioned are the numerous and varied charisms that the Holy Spirit is showering upon the Church of our times and from which so many ecclesial movements and new communities have been created. They are places that generate very effective itineraries of faith development for lay men and women, young and old. They are paths of Christian initiation that encourage lay people to go forth with missionary courage. So many men and women of our time, thanks to this new era of group endeavours of the lay faithful, have discovered the fascinating beauty of marriage and the family. For them it is a true vocation and a concrete way to holiness. Many of them have been generously receptive to life (large families!). Many have rediscovered the value of chastity in married life. Many marriages have been saved that had undergone a period of crisis and were on the verge of separation. Entire families have felt the missionary impulse and have been prepared to go forth to proclaim the Good News in mission countries (ad gentes).
The Gospel of the family, however, also leads others to say, like those disciples in the synagogue in Capernaum: “This is a hard teaching. Who can accept it?” (Jn 6:60), and they go away disappointed. Lay people trained in these new ecclesial associations have the courage to say with Peter: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. We have come to believe ... "(Jn 6:68-69). Indeed, these lay people convincingly say to the world that the Gospel of the family is not a utopia. It is well worth trusting in this way of life. The new season of associations of the faithful is therefore an important sign of hope for
the Church at a time in history when we are facing the challenge of the crisis of marriage and the family. Of course, the lay people involved in various forms of association are a minority, but – in the words of Pope emeritus Benedict XVI – they are a “creative minority” that are crucial to the future of the world. These groups, therefore, deserve to receive strong encouragement and support.
I conclude with the words of St. John Paul II, whom Pope Francis called the “Pope of the family”: “The Gospel is not a promise of easy success. It does not promise a comfortable life to anyone. It makes demands … The Gospel contains a fundamental paradox: to find life, one must lose life; to be born, one must die; to save oneself, one must take up the cross. This is the essential truth of the Gospel, which always and everywhere is bound to meet with man’s protest. Always and everywhere the Gospel will be a challenge to human weakness. But precisely in this challenge lies all its power. Man, perhaps subconsciously waits for such a challenge; indeed, man feels the inner need to transcend himself. Only in transcending himself does man become fully human”.11 The Gospel of the family can only be understood from this fundamental truth...
--
1) JOHN PAUL II, Apostolic Exhortation Familiaris consortio, n. 86.
2) ROBERT SPAEMANN, Divorce and remarriage, in: FIRST THINGS, August – September 2014.
3) Vatican Council II, Costituzione pastorale sulla Chiesa nel mondo contemporaneo,
Gaudium et spes, n. 47.
4) Benedict XVI, Celebrazione ecumenica nella Chiesa dell’ex-Convento degli Agostiniani di
Erfurt, in “Insegnamenti” VII, 2 (2011), p. 303.
5) Cfr Mt 5,13-16.
6) Dall’Epistola a Diogneto (Cap. 5-6; Funk 1, 317-321).
7) Francis, Discorso all’incontro con i volontari della XXVIII Giornata Mondiale della
Gioventù, in “L’Osservatore Romano”, 29-30 luglio 2014, p. 11.
8) Francis, Esortazione apostolica Evangelii gaudium, n. 25.
9) Cfr Mt 7,13-14; Lc 13,24.
10) ALESSANDRO MANZONI, I Promessi Sposi, De Agostini, p. 317.
11) John Paul II, Varcare la soglia della speranza, Mondadori, pp. 118-119.
Prophetic Mission
Problem with marriage is some people think that the man is the held of the house hold while the woman is the slave because of Eve's sin. What a pity?
ReplyDeleteDear Anonymous at 3:49 pm,
DeleteIn a marriage, when a husband and wife truly love each other as they should, it would not matter to the wife that her husband is the head of the house. She loves her husband and placed her trust in him to lead their family. And when the husband loves his wife, he will lead the family by serving them.
Diana, I envy you. Perhaps you have a "dream husband" that Catholic teaching talks about as role model. Unfortunately, the majority of women are not so lucky. On Guam family violence is a real problem. Your husband may give you everything and respect you as a high educated, high achiever woman. But not all husband are the same. Would you exploit your good luck by recommending women who suffer daily abuses at home to be obedient to a husband who might be an insensitive crude, alcoholic or drug addict, who is so much different from yours??
DeleteWould you be obedient to your husband if he would be a Protestant demanding your daughters to be baptized into his denomination? Would you be obedient to him if he would be a Muslim who demand you to wear burqa covering your face? Don't you know the Church allows you to intermarry with someone of other denominations or religion as long as you keep yours? You see that your blanket world view of blind obedience cannot be left unchallenged in a real world.
Blind obedience to unnamed authorities also has been discredited in the 20th century by the Holocaust that exterminated millions of people because of their religion. If you say NO to violence, genocide and ethnic cleansing then you also have to say NO to rigid, unethical commands that leads you in that direction. Isaias quotes the Pope talking about maintaining "the moral edifice of the church". What do you think this means? Would this not mean unalienable liberties that would be immoral to be restricted by anyone?! Please, think before you utter a blanket "no" to all the achievements of the human right movements in the last 100 years.
Dear voice of faith,
DeleteI think that every woman would want to have their husbands be more like Christ. What woman would not? And I am sure that every husband would also want their wife to be more like Mary who represents Mother Church. Mary never nagged her husband Joseph. :)
Dear vof, as usual your question are sophisms. Either God is always good or God is a monster. Can we believe that God provides for both the priest the nurse and all the other people who have died and will die of Ebola? I am sure that priest did NOT trust God to prevent him from getting sick. I can assure you however that he believed God is good even if he died of Ebola. Fr. Damian had no such surety and he ultimately died of leprosy. Heroic virtue is trusting God is good and will provide even in situations that are to all rational monstrous. And that applies to the anonymous talking about abusive husbands. Bl. Elizabeth Canori Mora was in an abusive marriage for 20 years. Her love for her brutal husband led that horrible man to repent after her death and even become a priest. There is now a cause to canonize him. A thieving brutal unfaithful sadistic man. He would be in jail today yet the church is considering his cause.
DeleteIf the NCW is reactionary outdated prehistoric for believing that we are all called to be saints then these labels are not insults but badges of honor. However last time I checked the Catholic Church believes the same.
I had very concrete questions and I am not surprised there is no answer. NeoCat ideology is apart from the Catholic mainstream. When a Catholic is looking at questions, NeoCats don't see anything just blank sheet. This is the problem. Abusive husbands must be apprehended and jailed. Especially those who beat and abandon their wives, then escape paying for the child. NeoCats are protecting these criminals from prosecution.
DeleteDear voice of faith,
DeleteHow is the NCW protecting these criminals from prosecution. If you are going to make this kind of accusation, you need to be more specific. The NCW does not approve of abusive husbands.
Dear vof,
DeleteI want to recommend scietia crucis by st. Edith stein. It is an incredible book on the Christian meaning of suffering. I think a lot of this thread is addressing exactly how a Christian confronts suffering (Ebola, abusive husband etc). Each of us has a conscience and we must listen to it so if your conscience tells you that you do not agree with the NCW then you need to listen to it. However conscience needs to be informed as well and I can't think of anyone catholic who does not agree with Edith stein's presentation of Christian suffering. I can understand that if you already have formed your mind on the NCW anything we say might not be agreeable with you. So perhaps it Edith stein will be more palatable. It is always positive to hear or read about a problem from another perspective.
Dear Anonymous, Edith Stein speaks about suffering inevitable. Whatever we do in our lives, we always have that kind of suffering. However, there is another kind, the avoidable kind of suffering that is not necessary to inflict on any inhabitants of our earth. I mean nobody should suffer unnecessarily.
DeleteEdith Stein is way out of the scope of the NeoCat because she was a true Catholic. Unlike NeoCat ideology, Edith Stein insisted to the sound doctrines of the Church. She had to die because the Church did not protect her from suffering. She, together with Simone Weil, were the greatest mystique Catholic souls for our modern time, especially for the 20th century.
Now, spreading Ebola in Europe is completely unnecessarily! This priest who returned to Spain with Ebola did not think of others only for himself. He felt good about dying that he accepted. However, when he imposed death on others by spreading Ebola on them, he was acting unethically. I would say against the teaching of the Church. The same way, if an abusive husband leaves his wife without financial means, he is a criminal. He has an obligation by law to pay the full amount of child support. He also should face prosecution when he is beating up his family.
Social rules and the laws of a society must be respected even by the Church. When NeoCats command their members to accept unnecessary suffering in the form of an abusive husband or in the form of an estranged spouse who neglects the kids, then they throw the innocent into the pit of suffering that could be avoided. This is morally wrong, this is sin. Acting this way, NeoCats expose a retrograde ideology that hurts those who follow them and hurts the credibility of the Mother Church in a modern world.
This is the reason why Extraordinary Synods are called, that is for the Church to listen to the outcry of the people.
ReplyDeleteRoman Catholic Church leaders from around the world begin a two-week brainstorming session this weekend, on how to better present their teachings on marriage, family life, and sexuality to their flock.
The Pope says he wants bishops to participate freely, rather than have Vatican insiders dictate the
He stresses the importance of understanding the problems faced by the poor, rather than focussing only on obedience to unbending rules.
The dogmatic and moral teachings of the church are not all equivalent," he said. "The church's pastoral ministry cannot be obsessed with the transmission of a disjointed multitude of doctrines… We have to find a new balance, otherwise even the moral edifice of the church is likely to fall like a house of cards."(www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29493895)
Isaias, this quote from the Pope is especially dear in that pointing out that blind obedience is an oversimplified answer to a very complex reality that is our world. Human condition cannot be held back,as this has never been the intention of our Lord, by setting up primitive rules and blindly following the letters of these rules.
DeleteWhen NeoCats try to turn the clock of world history backward and entrap the Catholic Church in a mind set of the Ancient and of the Middle Ages, then they essentially expose their defective world view and misunderstanding of Biblical teachings. This shows their desire to control the church, their hunger for power and dominance. This is what frightens me and Diana is obviously not a person who could dispel these worries about the NeoCat.
What is for sure is that we all should read St Paul again, all his letters word by word, so that to discern the true meaning of what he says without imposing unjustified demands and blind obedience on people of intelligent faith.
agree Voice of Faith, the NeoCats, also needs to change the language that they often use more so the mind set.
DeleteThe Vatican led by Pope Francis called for this Synod on the Family. If what Diana is saying about the church's stand on these matters is clear and precise, then why did the Pope asked for a survey all over the world on the status of the family last year? Because the teachings/doctrine is disconnected and disjointed with the real life experience of people. That is why this Extraordinary Synod was called.
The NeoCats have always been against any form of social, cultural, political, religious liberation call within the Church and outside the Church. A religious priest once confronted me because I was announcing to him the kerygma while doing 2x2 for the Neocats saying, "Isaias, tell this woman, whose husband was taken by the military one night and lost her house and now dispossessed of love, family, because she protested against military encroachment in their village. Tell her what you are telling me about all those pious words (Diana knows what i mean) your community always flaunts.
I could not because, if i do, i will still be insistent on what i want to do or happen other than hearing and listening to her story. I got stop on my tracks. Good for me.
Their is no such thing as the mindset of the ancient. The truth is the truth today as it was 1,000 years ago. Christ the alpha and the omega. Read the blessing if the Easter candle for the paschal vigil. That is the truth. Not ideological fashions that change with every decade.
DeleteDear Anonymous at 5:25 pm,
DeleteThe Catholic Church has changed over the years. It was once a very small mustard seed. That mustard seed has now grown into a huge tree that it is difficult to recognize that this tree was once that small mustard seed. The tree today does not look anything like that small mustard seed because it has now grown into a huge tree. If it is still a mustard seed today.....it would be a DEAD mustard seed. The liturgies of the Catholic Church have changed over time. However, her teachings on faith and morals remains the same.
Dear Isaias,
DeleteThe survey was taken to see how many Catholics believe in what the Church teaches. It is not just the NCW who teach that pre-marital sex, same sex marriage, and homosexuality is wrong, the entire doctrine of the Catholic Church teaches it. But there are Catholics like yourself who feel that the Catholic Church are behind the times and should allow same sex marriage among other things.
Hi Isaias, very true! NeoCat ideology has no concept of social progress or advancement of human rights. They worship the "almighty male" and despise women. They want to reduce the role of women to breeding and producing offsprings like a cow. Ouch! Similar atavistic views as the Mennonites have in Pennsylvania who refuse to sit on an airplane because "our Lord has never took a flight on a plane". Lol!
DeleteOne important issue is the teaching of the Church in contraception. In African countries, or in Guam for that matter, this teaching perpetuates poverty. Poor families have to rear many kids who won't have a chance in their life to get out of poverty. This is an entrapment in social disadvantage. Liberation would spell out sensitive policies when meaningful contraception, but not abortion, can be used. Many Catholic families use contraceptives on the assumption that Rome has no saying in personal family matters. This is a fact of life that the Church has to face.
DeleteDear voice of faith at 7:11 a,m,
DeleteI take it then that you are in favor of contraceptives and abortion? God calls everyone to a vocation. If a woman is single, she is supposed to be chaste and not producing offsprings until she marries. If God calls her to be a nun, then she would take a vow of chastity. The Church believes in being open to life.
"..would spell out sensitive policies when meaningful contraception, but not abortion, can be used."
Deleteeasily read that VOF is not for abortion per quote.
Dear Anonymous at 10:25 am,
DeleteIf vof is against abortion, he/she should also be against contraception. Some contraceptives is the same as abortion. The Church teach that life begins at conception. There are some contraceptives that prevents a fertilized egg from implanting itself in the uterus. A fertilized egg is considered human life.
That is why Diana, the Holy Father has, Pope Francis sent a message for Catholic bishops meeting in Baltimore Monday: he told them to make the Church more welcoming. Pope Francis wants the bishops to find out what Americans think about issues including same-sex marriage, divorce and contraception. The Vatican has taken the unprecedented step of asking bishops to survey their dioceses.What questions do divorced and remarried people pose to the Church concerning the Sacraments?" and Is there a law in your country recognizing civil unions for people of the same sex and equating it in some way to marriage? These are the questions being raised Diana in the Synod.
DeleteThe idea is to reconcile what's preached from the pulpit and the reality of life for people in the pews.
If you are already sure about the answer, why would the Holy Father call for a Synod? Because there is a dislocation that is happening.
He could have just struck them down with doctrine as you stated in your post about, abortion, contraception, divorce, same sex blessing. But he did not. The Pope wants to hear what people at the pews are experiencing.
The NeoCats can learn a thing or two from the Pope. Listening without demanding, conversation rather than blind obedience.
Diana, I don't understand you. You are a wife of an ideal husband, as we had learned it about you, and a mother of some beautiful daughter(s). You should know all about family life. But you don't. I am firmly anti-abortion as all Catholics are. Actually, many Protestant groups also share our feelings against abortion. However, I cannot blame those who use some meaningful ways of contraception. Even Ogino-Knaus is a way of contraception despite the fact that it has been sanctioned by the Church!
DeleteThe truth of the matter is that many Catholics use some form of contraception to avoid unwanted pregnancy. I am not advocating any kind of contraception, but some mild form that does not cause damage to anyone's good health, be it physical, mental or spiritual health. This is what I mean when I refer to sensitive, meaningful ways of contraceptive measures.
Now, the Pope definitely wants to face this issue rather than duck it and bury his head in the sand. As Isaias said Pope Francis is a very sensitive guy who knows well what is at stake. The flock will listen to him only if he is also listening to the flock. This is not the way you guys have in the NeoCat as I understand. But hey, it is not the Pope's problem. It is the problem of Arguello who apparently missed some catechesis sessions on the Church's teaching of liberation through the redemptive power of Christ.
voice-of-faithOctober 10, 2014 at 2:07 AM you have no clue this charism teaches. Being in the sideline your passing judgement has no bearing.
DeleteAmazing words… It seems as if Cardinal Rylko is referring in a very clear and loud way to the Neocatechumenal Way : “Strengthened by this assurance, Pope Francis wants to launch a new season of
ReplyDeleteevangelisation in the Church, marked by a joy that comes not from human calculations, but from theological hope. Among the signs of hope that must be mentioned are the numerous and varied charisms that the Holy Spirit is showering upon the Church of our times and from which so many ecclesial movements and new communities have been created. They are places that generate very effective itineraries of faith development for lay men and women,
young and old. They are paths of Christian initiation that encourage lay people to go forth with missionary courage. So many men and women of our time, thanks to this new era of group endeavours of the lay faithful, have discovered the fascinating beauty of marriage and the family. For them it is a true vocation and a concrete way to holiness. Many of them have been generously receptive to life (large families!). Many have rediscovered the value of chastity in married life. Many marriages have been saved that had undergone a period of
crisis and were on the verge of separation. Entire families have felt the missionary impulse and have been prepared to go forth to proclaim the Good News in mission countries (ad gentes).”
No recent praises for the NeoCat from Rome. Arguello promised to evangelize China and he got a lot of resources to do so. However, he is not going to China! China is led by communists who are dangerous for the missionaries. So Kiko postponed the mission indefinitely. NeoCat missionaries are not even speaking Chinese! So all this China business of the NeoCat is kinda fake and Rome just figured this out. That is why the Pope is not smiling on Kiko anymore...
DeleteAnon at 9:41 PM. This is hardly surprising is it? Card Rylko has often demonstrated a devotion to Kiko and a support of the NCW, which is disproportionate and partisan. It sounds just like the "party line", doesn't it? Another parrot of Kiko's propaganda. All the more reason to insist that the truth about the NCW be finally made plain.
Deletevoice-of-faith October 9, 2014 at 7:16 AM
ReplyDeletevoice of faithless, thank you for my salvation.
Dear Diana,
ReplyDeleteI for one agree with your stance on the family - it is in line with what the Popes would like people to understand. Pope Francis called this Synod to know and acknowledge all the peoples fears on ie artificial contraception, etc. But, he will not change church teachings. He will try his hardest to get people to dig deep into their hearts to understand the beauty behind what God desires. The road to heaven is narrow - but with the help of the Holy Spirit, we ARE capable. The Pope is going to see if there are other ways we can be faithful, without falling into sin. He is truly concerned that we get to heaven.
There is however an area that the NCW can be a better witness to the truth of the large family. They can join with the regular Sunday Masses rather than continue with their "own" on Saturday nights. To "see" their well-behaved children enjoy and participate in the Mass would speak volumes to those of us who always thought it was better to have one or two kids so that we could provide "everything" for them. It would combat this generation of many spoiled children and also many depressed and suicidal kids.
It would also be beneficial to the NCW to be obedient to the "approved" Statutes of 2008 which says to celebrate Mass according to the Roman Missal. (Not with all the NCW's unapproved additions and deletions.)
Thank you for all the good that you do. Praying that we get to see you in the pew.