tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post613539268659988520..comments2024-03-20T11:41:40.379+10:00Comments on Neocatechumenal Way - An Insider's View: A Note From Father EdivaldoDianahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comBlogger48125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-87496157422338252012016-05-24T19:45:44.082+10:002016-05-24T19:45:44.082+10:00Dear Anonymous at 5:46 pm,
I only quoted the dic...Dear Anonymous at 5:46 pm, <br /><br />I only quoted the dictionary because you said that "charge" only applies to criminal acts and therefore, do not understand what "charge" means. A person can be charged (accused) with defamation. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-40717867122030963952016-05-24T17:46:07.234+10:002016-05-24T17:46:07.234+10:00Sorry if I'm being rude, but if you're goi...Sorry if I'm being rude, but if you're going to make an argument, please don't quote dictionary.com or other dictionary, unless it is a technical word and your audience has little to no knowledge of the technical term(s). Just define it. The audience should know where to find the definition of the term. You sound less credible and immature when you quote the dictionary and an online one at that. <br /><br />Instead, please use more credible resources to support your claims. Your argument(s) will be more convincing that way.<br /><br />Just some of my two cents.... <br /><br />**You don't have to post this**Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-30749790020574159682016-05-23T17:52:31.559+10:002016-05-23T17:52:31.559+10:00Dear Anonymous at 5:37 pm,
According to Dictiona...Dear Anonymous at 5:37 pm, <br /><br />According to Dictionary.com, charge can be defined as "to accuse formally or explicitly." Furthermore, I never said that defamation is a crime. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-71351881726529914002016-05-23T17:37:31.015+10:002016-05-23T17:37:31.015+10:00You don't get "charged" with defamat...You don't get "charged" with defamation. Charges are for criminal cases and crimes. Defamation is not a crime. GIVE IT UPAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-40943479511968133852016-05-23T13:17:15.440+10:002016-05-23T13:17:15.440+10:00Dear Anonymous at 11:28 am,
Tim can be charged f...Dear Anonymous at 11:28 am, <br /><br />Tim can be charged for defamation of character because he used Father Edivaldo's photo to represent him in a false and negative light. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-20390610632456897372016-05-23T11:28:41.535+10:002016-05-23T11:28:41.535+10:00Even if Edi can stop Tim from using that photo, it...Even if Edi can stop Tim from using that photo, it is not a "crime" and there will be no consequence for Tim posting it. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-55282020987595914942016-05-23T09:24:43.874+10:002016-05-23T09:24:43.874+10:00Situation so demoralizing on Guam we need outside ...Situation so demoralizing on Guam we need outside help Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-10630901232412178342016-05-23T09:24:33.257+10:002016-05-23T09:24:33.257+10:00Situation so demoralizing on Guam we need outside ...Situation so demoralizing on Guam we need outside help Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-27646010332563925822016-05-23T07:58:41.848+10:002016-05-23T07:58:41.848+10:00Dear Anonymous at 12:20 am,
Personally, I think ...Dear Anonymous at 12:20 am, <br /><br />Personally, I think it is best if it goes to court. I think that after the court trial, there would be unity again. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-64973130434637410522016-05-23T00:22:35.494+10:002016-05-23T00:22:35.494+10:00Karma is not catholic teaching.
Law of Karma is b...Karma is not catholic teaching. <br />Law of Karma is budhist.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-5901536895840382782016-05-23T00:20:03.074+10:002016-05-23T00:20:03.074+10:00
Archdiocese is so Divided over Archbishop. I supp...<br />Archdiocese is so Divided over Archbishop. I support him but i fail to see how he can continue to lead with the questions hanging over him.<br />Should this go to court Archdiocese further divides.<br />Respected Retirement would perhaps be best way forward. Its about unity of the church. Not individuals. <br />Unfortunately Archbishop became a polarizing figure. This is not helping Archdiocese.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-27775472800101651552016-05-22T23:56:22.649+10:002016-05-22T23:56:22.649+10:00
My friends fasting for the spiritual conversion o...<br />My friends fasting for the spiritual conversion of all in JW.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-58645991759931952102016-05-22T23:36:39.188+10:002016-05-22T23:36:39.188+10:00Dear Anonymous at 9:59 pm,
Yes, it does.Dear Anonymous at 9:59 pm, <br /><br />Yes, it does.Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-76263075802283874532016-05-22T21:59:13.084+10:002016-05-22T21:59:13.084+10:00None of these conditions applies to the photo of F...None of these conditions applies to the photo of Fr ediwaldo, though?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-61968324498134729072016-05-22T20:49:23.137+10:002016-05-22T20:49:23.137+10:00Dear Anonymous at 1:05 pm,
Sweetheart, according ...Dear Anonymous at 1:05 pm,<br /><br />Sweetheart, according to the legal encyclopedia:<br /><br />Question:<br />What rights does a person have if their picture was taken and then posted to an Internet website without permission? Is the person entitled to any of the website's profit? Can the person sue if the picture was uncomplimentary?<br /><br />Answer: <br />You can stop a website's use of your image for three reasons: invasion of privacy, violation of right of publicity, or defamation.<br /><br />Invasion of privacy can occur if you are portrayed falsely and in a highly offensive manner. For example, your photo was posted at America's Most Wanted's website, and you are not wanted -- by the law. Your privacy may also be invaded if the photo was taken by someone who intruded on you in a situation in which you had a reasonable expectation of privacy -- for example, in your own home. It is not an invasion of privacy to photograph someone in a public place or at any event where the public is invited.<br /><br />Another reason to stop the use is known as the right of publicity. This occurs if your image is used for commercial purposes such as to sell products or to imply that you endorse a product. If the photo is used in a commercial website -- that is, one sponsored by a business or that sells products or services -- the unauthorized use of your image would probably violate your right of publicity. The public must be able to identify you in the photograph.<br /><br />You can also stop the website use if the photo defames you -- that is, it creates a false impression and injures your reputation. For example, it would be defamatory to doctor a photo to make it seem as if you were shoplifting. The fact that an unmodified photo is unflattering is not enough to claim defamation. The photo must falsely portray you and must cause people in the community to think less of you.<br /><br />http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/question-unauthorized-use-of-photo-28285.htmlDianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-63574201764420836142016-05-22T18:03:07.798+10:002016-05-22T18:03:07.798+10:00
Praying fasting for our beloved Archbishop.
Prayi...<br />Praying fasting for our beloved Archbishop.<br />Praying those who persecuate him see the light peace joy of christ turning away from their sin. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-51341833228912876942016-05-22T17:21:04.770+10:002016-05-22T17:21:04.770+10:00Everyone stop saying Karma. It's ridiculous.Everyone stop saying Karma. It's ridiculous. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-18737150062381283142016-05-22T13:05:36.482+10:002016-05-22T13:05:36.482+10:00Darling I don't need to look it up. I know the...Darling I don't need to look it up. I know the law. I am a lawyer and previously worked for more than 10 years in the civil division of the Attorney General's Office. So again, don't try and debate me on the law. I bet you won't even print this comment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-88127089586687531672016-05-22T12:56:34.108+10:002016-05-22T12:56:34.108+10:0010:28 AM I"ll what damage was done. All of us...10:28 AM I"ll what damage was done. All of us! Msgnr James giving away burial plots for free (worth 7K). Free school @ St.Thomas Aquinas withh his croneys. You want more?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-65934557506003760822016-05-22T11:36:47.933+10:002016-05-22T11:36:47.933+10:00Dear Anonymous at 11:05 am,
You were told incorr...Dear Anonymous at 11:05 am, <br /><br />You were told incorrectly.Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-73600471756093339512016-05-22T11:05:10.143+10:002016-05-22T11:05:10.143+10:00
I was told these priests cannot say Mass.<br />I was told these priests cannot say Mass.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-48487424719268921992016-05-22T10:56:19.407+10:002016-05-22T10:56:19.407+10:00Dear Anonymous at 10:28 am,
You are exaggerating...Dear Anonymous at 10:28 am, <br /><br />You are exaggerating. Father Paul and Monsignor James were not damaged. They are still priests and can administer the sacraments. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-64716185022375950722016-05-22T10:53:19.117+10:002016-05-22T10:53:19.117+10:00Dear Anonymous at 9:59 am,
How you use someone&#...Dear Anonymous at 9:59 am, <br /><br />How you use someone's personal photo is what makes it legal or not. It does not matter if the photo was on the internet or not. Look it up if you do not believe me. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-85505696148867494982016-05-22T10:33:01.799+10:002016-05-22T10:33:01.799+10:00I am happy you found a deeper faith in the NCW. I am happy you found a deeper faith in the NCW. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-7495679161635565982016-05-22T10:28:10.527+10:002016-05-22T10:28:10.527+10:007.38pm. The suffering which Archbishop inflicted o...7.38pm. The suffering which Archbishop inflicted on others during his Thirty year reign of terror is nothing to how he felt when the statements were made public.<br />Much of this could have been laid to rest but Archbishop continued to damage priests. <br />I tell you it is all Karma coming back to Archbishop. Sorry i have no sympathay for the monster.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com