tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post4516698607402745671..comments2024-03-20T11:41:40.379+10:00Comments on Neocatechumenal Way - An Insider's View: The Family Of GodDianahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comBlogger35125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-41208829480433584072016-07-20T14:13:47.947+10:002016-07-20T14:13:47.947+10:00AnonymousJuly 19, 2016 at 11:57 PM said:
By the w...AnonymousJuly 19, 2016 at 11:57 PM said: <br />By the way, RAM must be an extremely curious fellow. For his information, most people do NOT have the custom to watch when they have the "call of nature". It is just not the way to do it. Lol.<br /><br />Then you must be woman. Men, however, can hardly miss noticing if they're circumcised or not. lol. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-13520173477018440452016-07-20T08:16:57.851+10:002016-07-20T08:16:57.851+10:00Dear Anonymous at 7:24 am,
I doubt it especially...Dear Anonymous at 7:24 am, <br /><br />I doubt it especially when he spoke of "circumcision." Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-49022054368380028462016-07-20T07:28:28.395+10:002016-07-20T07:28:28.395+10:00Where did he submit something from the Remnant? I ...Where did he submit something from the Remnant? I don't see that anywhere. I saw he commented, but it doesn't look like he posted anything from there. Why not just ask him?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-74260623596477386242016-07-20T07:24:19.898+10:002016-07-20T07:24:19.898+10:00Pee covenant? He was referring to the conjugal act...Pee covenant? He was referring to the conjugal act, which is of nature and not of sin, especially in the context of Holy Matrimony. The same is true with menses. They are both of nature, and both are intimately tied to the first command of God to "be fruitful and multiply." <br /><br />Is your fury for Glaucon so intense that it's darkened your mind?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-18486134187853148602016-07-20T00:32:31.626+10:002016-07-20T00:32:31.626+10:00Dear Anonymous at 10:33 pm,
And in response to R...Dear Anonymous at 10:33 pm, <br /><br />And in response to RAM's comment, Glaucon saw nothing wrong with it. LOL!!! In his response: <br /><br />Glaucon JrJuly 19, 2016 at 11:45 PM<br />Indeed, well said. <br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-10951985187304123002016-07-19T23:57:57.043+10:002016-07-19T23:57:57.043+10:00Dear folks, perhaps it is only me, but I cannot he...Dear folks, perhaps it is only me, but I cannot help but laughing and laughing loud and hard until my shoulder is shaking uncontrollably when I read the theological masterpiece of someone called RAM, God bless his good heart whoever he might be... He gives the following remarkable lecture to Diana about the "true meaning" of the covenant of God with his people:<br /><br />RAMJuly 19, 2016 at 10:33 PM<br /><br />"The sign of this covenant is circumcision, for each time the priestly members, males will attend to the call of nature, they will see the sign, and it will serve as a reminder of the Covenant between them and God."<br /><br />Sweet Lord in heaven! Is this for real?? Is RAM truly proposing that some kind of "pee-covenant" is what makes a nation? ROTFL!<br /><br />By the way, RAM must be an extremely curious fellow. For his information, most people do NOT have the custom to watch when they have the "call of nature". It is just not the way to do it. Lol.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-6503416299366694662016-07-19T23:04:03.544+10:002016-07-19T23:04:03.544+10:00Dear Anonymous at 10:55 pm,
No. He said that a ...Dear Anonymous at 10:55 pm, <br /><br />No. He said that a SECOND way to build a nation is the shared experience of the people. He then went on to explain how the nation of Israel was built as a result of this shared experience. This is incorrect. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-36108796840155486332016-07-19T22:55:01.878+10:002016-07-19T22:55:01.878+10:00He said it's the shared experience of the work...He said it's the shared experience of the work of God. Not individual experience. If that is false teaching then where does it say it is false? The memorial of a whole group of people is a shared experience. Give it up. You just won't admit that he proved every thing he said with the catechism. Now who is proudAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-5422272252547447582016-07-19T22:53:35.489+10:002016-07-19T22:53:35.489+10:00Dear Anonymous at 10:14 pm,
I am sorry. I must ...Dear Anonymous at 10:14 pm, <br /><br />I am sorry. I must have missed that part about Mary. As I said I did not read his entire post. What was his question about Mary?Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-20365105487270882702016-07-19T22:20:48.928+10:002016-07-19T22:20:48.928+10:00These old people only try to have some fun to chas...These old people only try to have some fun to chase their boredom. The jungle, the CCOG and the LFM are just some kind of movie theater for them to enjoy their time, to meet and reach out to each other. Perhaps the church could do more for these manamko by re-establishing the good old coffee-doughnut chat sessions after parish masses that would bring people closer to each other. <br /><br />Manamko at the parishes could get involved in more charity events rather than going out to protest against the church. It is much better to build the church by faith, love and charity than trying to destroy it by silly protests and picketing. What is this good for? The whole story is getting very old and boring by now...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-31657690149467164262016-07-19T22:14:10.465+10:002016-07-19T22:14:10.465+10:00Anon @ 2:07 pm, Diana doesn't defend herself a...Anon @ 2:07 pm, Diana doesn't defend herself all the time. She just does a lot of <i>Jungle Cleaning</i>. That's not defending herself. That's just letting the jungle know there wrongAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-3490154676244324362016-07-19T21:39:51.405+10:002016-07-19T21:39:51.405+10:00Lol, anon at 11:01, so you just admitted that don&...Lol, anon at 11:01, so you just admitted that don't read Glau's submissions either... Cool! Because he actually included a whole article from the Remnant blog, popularizing its insipid anti-Pope propaganda an indolent bias against Pope Francis. Make no mistake, my friend, the Remnant blog IS schismatic and anti-Vatican to its core!<br /><br />Now, you cannot hide that long what you really think about the Supreme Pontiff and about the authority of Vatican. If you despise the Pope and mock the authority of the Curia, then you are probably not even a Catholic but someone who was SENT by the adversaries of the church to penetrate, stir controversy and destroy Roman Catholics from inside! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-63627592775261079572016-07-19T21:27:55.168+10:002016-07-19T21:27:55.168+10:00We show them wrong by our very existence. Lol!We show them wrong by our very existence. Lol!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-13417076099473195552016-07-19T20:16:43.860+10:002016-07-19T20:16:43.860+10:00You called him out, he supported his position. Tha... You called him out, he supported his position. That's it. You don't have to admit he beat you, but don't accuse him of pride. Or do you know him? Did God reveal this to you somehow about him>? And you STILL haven't answered where he called YOU out on Mary. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-40575504472787094062016-07-19T19:14:43.777+10:002016-07-19T19:14:43.777+10:00Glaucon pretty long winded.1st paragraph I already...Glaucon pretty long winded.1st paragraph I already quit reading it. Ummmm get to the point?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-28651463977737601342016-07-19T18:01:13.757+10:002016-07-19T18:01:13.757+10:00Dear Anonymous at 2:07 pm,
It is pride. And I d...Dear Anonymous at 2:07 pm, <br /><br />It is pride. And I do not defend myself all the time. When I find that I am wrong, I admit my mistake. A person with pride cannot admit their mistakes.Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-1618771418240284832016-07-19T17:45:12.130+10:002016-07-19T17:45:12.130+10:00glaucon didn't say anything about the remnant ...glaucon didn't say anything about the remnant did he? it looks like his comments responded to other comments. Why not ask him what he thinks he hasn't been shy yetAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-47357753364779419942016-07-19T17:44:04.494+10:002016-07-19T17:44:04.494+10:00Dear Anonymous at 2:06 pm,
He said that the nati...Dear Anonymous at 2:06 pm, <br /><br />He said that the nation of Israel was built as a result of "shared experience" of the Passover. That is incorrect. The Catechism only says that the Jews recall the Passover as more than a memorial. It did not say that the Passover or a "shared experience" built Israel. That is what Glaucon Jr. wants you to believe. This is false teaching. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-82404319267158724802016-07-19T15:49:59.340+10:002016-07-19T15:49:59.340+10:00Glaucon Jr. still does not get it that it was a mi...Glaucon Jr. still does not get it that it was a mistake to popularize the "Remnant blog" at the jungle. Its blatant anti-Pope bias criticizing and attacking Pope Francis on every turn is so amply demonstrated that only fools wanna be associated with the silliness of this blog. <br /><br />Only Ray D that he had the courage to expose the anti-Catholic machination of the new "jungle master". He said this:<br /><br />rey dJuly 19, 2016 at 11:01 AM<br /><br />sorry, but the words "funhouse Church that Francis is bullding" automatically made this article lose credibility to me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-30007455490415721272016-07-19T15:49:36.855+10:002016-07-19T15:49:36.855+10:00So why is it you don't show how the JW critici...So why is it you don't show how the JW criticism is wrong? If they're wrong, show it and shut them up. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-87023241781039551812016-07-19T14:24:58.573+10:002016-07-19T14:24:58.573+10:00You always have an excuse for everything. So you&...You always have an excuse for everything. So you're implying that you were also responding as "Anonymous" in your own blog? So it's safe to say that maybe all of the comments in this blog are written by the same person. Are you that delusional? LOL!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-42841844675128801982016-07-19T14:07:22.315+10:002016-07-19T14:07:22.315+10:00You called him a heretic. That's not pride, it...You called him a heretic. That's not pride, it's self-defense. You defend yourself all the time. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-18638186150790495132016-07-19T14:06:43.811+10:002016-07-19T14:06:43.811+10:00He didn't say that. You said it was about circ...He didn't say that. You said it was about circumcision. He said it's about the Passover. That was his point, and he used the catechism to prove it. You should have read the whole thing. At least he read yours. He said alot more than than that, and he proved you wrong on all of it, and gave you credit where he were right. <br /><br /><br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-63688651700759949502016-07-19T13:34:17.681+10:002016-07-19T13:34:17.681+10:00Dear Anonymous at 12:57 pm,
Actually, he did not...Dear Anonymous at 12:57 pm, <br /><br />Actually, he did not prove me wrong at all. Glaucon Jr. Went on a different direction. He spoke about Abraham being the father of many nations. My post was clear. God chose the descendants of Abraham through the line of Isaac and Jacob. It was only through this line of descendants that God called His people, and it was through this line that one can see the sign of God's covenant with Abraham. He was called the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob (the God of Israel). He was never called the God of Ishmael despite that Ishmael was Abraham's son. Ishmael was not the chosen one. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-89067208321893118652016-07-19T13:25:43.548+10:002016-07-19T13:25:43.548+10:00Dear Anonymous at 12:55 pm,
I only read the firs...Dear Anonymous at 12:55 pm, <br /><br />I only read the first five paragraphs and then gave up. The rest was not worth reading. Obviously, his pride was hurt over what I wrote. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.com