tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post2411208911400113088..comments2024-03-20T11:41:40.379+10:00Comments on Neocatechumenal Way - An Insider's View: Deed Restriction Still In PlaceDianahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comBlogger51125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-66328553604620672732016-08-28T20:44:49.256+10:002016-08-28T20:44:49.256+10:00Dear Anonymous at 5:41 pm,
No, he did not. He o...Dear Anonymous at 5:41 pm, <br /><br />No, he did not. He only quoted what he said was on the letter. The letter itself was never published. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-88841800322596020892016-08-28T17:41:22.972+10:002016-08-28T17:41:22.972+10:00Yes. Hé published thé letter.Yes. Hé published thé letter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-32166623718366092542016-08-27T08:39:25.621+10:002016-08-27T08:39:25.621+10:00Dear Anonymous at 8:26 am,
All you had was Tim&#...Dear Anonymous at 8:26 am, <br /><br />All you had was Tim's word on that. He never published that letter in his blog. He could have published the letter and blacked out the person's name to protect his/her identity, but he never did that. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-85470458801721580432016-08-27T08:26:08.519+10:002016-08-27T08:26:08.519+10:00It's already been established that the person ...It's already been established that the person did NOT know about the RMS seminary. In fact, Apuron had requested that she sign something to that effect and she said she couldn't because that would be lying.<br />What's annoying are the assumptions made w/o first knowing the truth.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-19115530881674486652016-08-26T23:36:02.900+10:002016-08-26T23:36:02.900+10:00Dear Anonymous at 11:27 pm,
Kiko Arguello is th...Dear Anonymous at 11:27 pm, <br /><br />Kiko Arguello is the one who represents the NCW because he is the founder. Mr. Gennarini is not the founder, but the head catechists of the U.S. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-80002404758225283092016-08-26T23:27:05.800+10:002016-08-26T23:27:05.800+10:00Diana @ 8:12 AM, you say "The Genarinnis does...Diana @ 8:12 AM, you say "The Genarinnis does not represent the NCW" and yet in one article after another we read "… <b>Giuseppe Gennarini, leader of the 500 Neocatechumenal Way communities in the United States</b>. "<br />He's a <b><i>LEADER of NCW communities</i></b> but you say he doesn't represent the NCW? What kind of a leader is that????<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-58158741219184194022016-08-26T23:12:20.177+10:002016-08-26T23:12:20.177+10:00This debate is annoying. Perhaps answering the fol...This debate is annoying. Perhaps answering the following questions will help everyone understand why that building is even owned by the Archdiocese of Agana in the first place.<br /><br />1. Has anyone asked why this RMS building was purchased in the first place?<br />2. Who's money was used to purchase it? <br />3. What will CCOG have the church do with this building if RMS moves out of it? <br /><br />Let me take a guess at the answers. Correct me if my guess is out there.<br /><br />1. That building was purchased for the purpose of establishing an RMS Seminary. Why else would the church of Guam buy a building like that and its first use after the purchase is a Seminary...wait, the archdiocese did not pay a cent for that building, someone else did.<br /><br />2. Klitskie mentioned they would turn it into a Diocesan Seminary. Does Klitskie or the CCOG know how to form priests and run a seminary? I doubt they do. What will most likely happen is that if the RMS leaves, that building will not be used and will sit there rotting while they fight over it, and sell it in the end. <br /><br />Klitskie, CCOG, LFM, and whoever else out there do not have the authority to determine the use of that building, the Archbishop does, so shut up already.<br /><br />Another question.<br /><br />Why would someone pay for a building for the archdiocese without knowing what the building was going to be used for? <br /><br />Perhaps that person paid for the building because he or she, knew what the building was going to be used as an RMS Seminary.<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-73010170210680711722016-08-26T13:52:22.058+10:002016-08-26T13:52:22.058+10:00Dear Anonymous at 12:39 pm,
Archbishop Hon is as...Dear Anonymous at 12:39 pm, <br /><br />Archbishop Hon is asking the NCW to give up RMS. How can that be done when the NCW does not even own it?Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-39296245269673690732016-08-26T12:39:26.979+10:002016-08-26T12:39:26.979+10:00When HON first came to Guam, you were very critica...When HON first came to Guam, you were very critical of the people in the jungle respecting and obeying HON. Why don't you following your owe advise?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-63967603834726170722016-08-26T12:37:48.168+10:002016-08-26T12:37:48.168+10:00No there is a sole incorporator when the RMS corpo...No there is a sole incorporator when the RMS corporation was formed. But the members of RMS are the board members and the board of guarantors. You are wrong. Read the articles...the guarantors can override decisions by the board. If it wasn't true why did the articles list both the board of director and the guarantors....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-46349469646249520732016-08-26T12:36:23.194+10:002016-08-26T12:36:23.194+10:00Why did Archbishop Hon decide to reveal it in the ...Why did Archbishop Hon decide to reveal it in the first place? He was sent here for unity not division. Isn't revealing this creating division? So isn't he, too, also going against the orders of the Pope?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-27126061127479069442016-08-26T12:04:26.935+10:002016-08-26T12:04:26.935+10:00Dear Anonymous at 10:42 am,
The RMS property alr...Dear Anonymous at 10:42 am, <br /><br />The RMS property already belongs to the Archdiocese of Agana. And the NCW has nothing to do with the Deed Restriction. According to the Articles of Incorporation, there is only one sole member in RMS, and that is Archbishop Apuron. The other people I the Board of Directors and Board of Guarantors are NOT members of RMS. A non-member cannot rescind the Deed Restriction nor sign any papers to that effect. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-81729677707887895712016-08-26T10:42:06.191+10:002016-08-26T10:42:06.191+10:00
I speak on behalf of the Holy See.
The Holy See t...<br />I speak on behalf of the Holy See.<br />The Holy See through Archbishop Hon are asking the NCW to rescind the deed. Follow the Holy Farher Diana on ALL matters not only your cafteria stle of Church. Obedience to Rome please!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-14257047030161271032016-08-25T21:27:26.732+10:002016-08-25T21:27:26.732+10:00the intent of the Holy See as personified by Archb...the intent of the Holy See as personified by Archbishop Hon is to ask for the deed to be rescinded. That is the intent. The Holy See stands before you in the person of Archbishop Hon. He has ask you to do something specific. Just Like how Pope Benedict says to follow the norms of the Eucharist, Kiko writes back in flowery prose how they will sit in a banquet..... Schism yourselves out of Catholicism already and call it a day!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-28846629230422203182016-08-25T20:28:14.202+10:002016-08-25T20:28:14.202+10:00Dear Anonymous at 3:17 pm,
He has consulted with...Dear Anonymous at 3:17 pm, <br /><br />He has consulted with the Presbyterial Counci. It would not hurt to consult the rector of RMS since it has to do with the seminary anyway. It would also save him the embarrassment of making a public statement of rescinding something he had no power to rescind.Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-55484735196070268952016-08-25T17:10:53.092+10:002016-08-25T17:10:53.092+10:00
AnonymousAugust 25, 2016 at 2:01 PM
The only m...<br /><br /><br />AnonymousAugust 25, 2016 at 2:01 PM<br /><br />The only misinterpretation here is you who pretend to know what the intent of the Holy See is.<br /><br />Are we to assume that you have a relationship with the Holy See and in fact can speak in behalf of their office?<br /><br />Yes or No.....simple question......can you just answer yes or no?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-77886711545003183682016-08-25T15:57:20.295+10:002016-08-25T15:57:20.295+10:00@1:59PM--
The problem with your way of thinking is...@1:59PM--<br />The problem with your way of thinking is that even pastors may be wrong...even they are susceptible to the devil's temptations! There have been many examples of this. <br />If, as you say, he made the decision based on what he believes is best, then why hide the fact that the Holy See requested that he rescind the deed restriction? Now that it's been discovered it just makes it appear that he has been deceptive. Yes, basic facts have been laid out, but you can't say it's clear if there are different assumptions being drawn.<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-54218965703664746992016-08-25T15:17:36.356+10:002016-08-25T15:17:36.356+10:00Here's the thing with Pius, why does Archbisho...Here's the thing with Pius, why does Archbishop Hon need to consult him before making a statement? This statement screams at your face...with ABAA Pius was running this Dioceses and Pius forgot his place with the Apostolic Administrator. <br /><br />The deed of restriction is in plain language. Apuron just can't sign it back. The three other named recipients of the deed all need to sign it in concordance in order to convey it back. Outright lie from Pius.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-12899313769345095192016-08-25T15:13:33.679+10:002016-08-25T15:13:33.679+10:0011:16- you're right on interpretation. It does...11:16- you're right on interpretation. It doesn't matter whos' asking however, Hon can speak on both authorities, Holy See or Congregation, but in the end he's still asking it back...no doubt or misinterpretation about that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-52020686178602077422016-08-25T14:01:00.474+10:002016-08-25T14:01:00.474+10:00There is no misinterpretation and Pius is mistaken...There is no misinterpretation and Pius is mistaken. The Holy see is no other than the bishop that seats on the chair that is the pope or/ the Curia. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-64254320052567431272016-08-25T13:59:42.110+10:002016-08-25T13:59:42.110+10:00If a request was made to Archbishop Apuron, and he...If a request was made to Archbishop Apuron, and he said no, then rather as seeing it as disobedience to the Holy See, perhaps we can see it through the eyes of what it means to lead the Church on Guam to God. Afterall, the Archbishop is a pastor. He is in charge of ensuring the growth of our faith in God. He, like all of us, will have to answer to God for those decisions made. If he believes that the RMS is a good thing for our spiritual growth, then we have the choice of accepting that decision or not. I believe the basic facts have all been made clear and laid out.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-73454389469949362292016-08-25T12:20:35.637+10:002016-08-25T12:20:35.637+10:00Dear Anonymous at 12:12 pm,
My response was to A...Dear Anonymous at 12:12 pm, <br /><br />My response was to Anonymous at 11:48 am, He/She asked about Archbishop Apuron. Mr. Gennarini's name was not mentioned. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-18222507246055325112016-08-25T12:12:22.131+10:002016-08-25T12:12:22.131+10:00Hey Diana @ 12:02 PM -- The question was in regard...Hey Diana @ 12:02 PM -- The question was in regards to why the Gennarinis are on the board when they're not even from here. Trying to sidestep the question eh?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-25915964210218842222016-08-25T12:04:54.564+10:002016-08-25T12:04:54.564+10:00Dear Anonymous at 12:02 pm,
They did not come he...Dear Anonymous at 12:02 pm, <br /><br />They did not come here of their own choice. Their names were pulled from a lottery. Dianahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13613247477141929635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8205973525389434155.post-48913526776247866292016-08-25T12:02:58.724+10:002016-08-25T12:02:58.724+10:00Diana - Makes you wonder why seminarians from Euro...Diana - Makes you wonder why seminarians from Europe would come to the seminary here on Guam when there's the Domus Galilaeae which is closer to them. What makes the Guam seminary so special for seminarians all over the world to come here? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com